NRP front page

[TiberiusB]

On the front page there are a few fields "Work being done...", "Current needs. Get involved!", "Value being created"
It is better to arrange those according to date, from most recent to further away in time. On SENSOPRICA's NRP front page, http://nrp.sensorica.co/ , the "Work being done..." is very long. It is more interesting to see what people are doing now, and cut this list to 6 months or so.

[TiberiusB]

I would also add most active projects. This helps sensoricans navigate to their projects faster, from the first page, by clicking on them, and find processes where they can log work. But it also shows other people development/work contexts that are busy.

[fosterlynn]

Good ideas.

[bhaugen]

Most active projects feature deployed, and I think the other improvements requested above were completed, too. Closing issue. Re-open if I missed something.

[TiberiusB]

Need to discuss the criteria used for this list?
Is is last logs, frequency of logs, the amount of time, a combination of those and more?
It`s a good start, but we need to tweak it.

I don`t think the Piezo pump should show in there
http://nrp.sensorica.co/accounting/contributions/236/
It has one contribution in 2016 and the next one is in 2014

Same with the not defined project.
http://nrp.sensorica.co/accounting/contributions/197/

Renovation lab should be pretty high in the list.
http://nrp.sensorica.co/accounting/agent/406/
206 contributions and almost all in 2016

[TiberiusB]

The "Work being done..." section is not very useful. It is too long and too granular... I think these types of work from processes are meaningless if not presented in context. The Process has more context.
It is rare that we add descriptions to these types of work when we create them in processes. That would be a lot of work and realistically, now one will systematically do it. The names are self-descriptive. So we cannot rely on the description of types of work.
One possibility is to cluster types of works and provide links to different processes, so one can chose to do something knowing more about the impact/purpose of this work.

[TiberiusB]

The "Value being created" section presents data that is not relevant to current activities. Does the filter only act on material assets? If so, I think we need to enlarge that to digital assets too.

[sqykly]

@TiberiusB
It looks like there was an attempt to fix the "Purpose: " bit, since a {% if %} was added to see if there is a process associated, but the text still comes from the item itself. Do you want the item's description to override the process's if it has a description?

Tentatively I'm just switching it over to use the process's timeline_description, which is the process notes or the process type's description if there are no process notes.

[sqykly]

It looks like the "Value being created" section is now including documents and such, so that is fixed?