You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
accoring to your error-handling documentation there are 3 kinds of errors: Syntax, Validation and Execution.
Syntax errors seem to be well covered by GraphQL\Error\SyntaxError, but for all other error cases the base GraphQL\Error\Error is used, which makes it impossible to distinguish errors qualitatively. This would e.g. be needed to filter out errors in bug trackers. E.g. if triggered by clients which send invalid queries, such as leaving out required parameters or sending incorrect parameter types.
Theoretically it would also be possible to distinguish those kinds of cases by properties provided on GraphQL\Error\Error. So far there is only a category property which could be used, but it changes based on if a previous exceptions is provided during construction time. As both cases appear within the codebase, this property can not be used to distinguish such use cases at the moment.
Introducing more error types via exceptions inheriting from GraphQL\Error\Error seems to be the cleaner approach, but would have the disadventage of breaking backwards compatibility, since e.g. the visitors of validation rules should return more specific exceptions as of now.
A backwards compatible way could be to introduce additional properties in GraphQL\Error\Error as described above, but would have the disadventage of not enabling a hierachy within exceptions.
What is your opinion on that topic?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am not convinced I agree with the categorization the docs put forth. In my opinion, syntax errors and validation errors fall in the same category - they are both caused by clients sending invalid requests.
I am not convinced I agree with the categorization the docs put forth. In my opinion, syntax errors and validation errors fall in the same category - they are both caused by clients sending invalid requests.
Yes, in some way they do. To me it would be fine to have them in one category, as long as they would be distinguishable from other errors which occure within the business logic implementation
Hi,
accoring to your error-handling documentation there are 3 kinds of errors: Syntax, Validation and Execution.
Syntax errors seem to be well covered by
GraphQL\Error\SyntaxError
, but for all other error cases the baseGraphQL\Error\Error
is used, which makes it impossible to distinguish errors qualitatively. This would e.g. be needed to filter out errors in bug trackers. E.g. if triggered by clients which send invalid queries, such as leaving out required parameters or sending incorrect parameter types.Theoretically it would also be possible to distinguish those kinds of cases by properties provided on
GraphQL\Error\Error
. So far there is only acategory
property which could be used, but it changes based on if a previous exceptions is provided during construction time. As both cases appear within the codebase, this property can not be used to distinguish such use cases at the moment.Introducing more error types via exceptions inheriting from
GraphQL\Error\Error
seems to be the cleaner approach, but would have the disadventage of breaking backwards compatibility, since e.g. the visitors of validation rules should return more specific exceptions as of now.A backwards compatible way could be to introduce additional properties in
GraphQL\Error\Error
as described above, but would have the disadventage of not enabling a hierachy within exceptions.What is your opinion on that topic?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: