-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Low R1 performance in the 2nd stage #9
Comments
I am having the same issue. Incidentally, did you have any such error with the fusion score? I was running it on MSVD
|
@BishmoyPaul I'm running it on MSRVTT. I have not seen any problems with the fusion score on MSRVTT. |
Same problem here. @whwu95 |
BTW, do you know the purpose of fusion_scores? @chenhao2345 |
@JosephPai I got similar performance. ~47.5 in stage 1 and 30 in stage 2. It seems to me that the authors get two similarity scores from stage 1 and stage 2, respectively. Then, they use fusion_scores to fuze the two similarity scores. |
I got R@1 45.3 in stage and 29.6 in stage 2, it seems like that the code is to do global matching ? |
i think its true |
Thanks for sharing your code. And how can I get the score 49 for R@1? |
@chenhao2345 @JosephPai @ASENNIU @BishmoyPaul Hi, can I know your batch size setting and the number of gpus you are using for training stage 1 & stage 2? |
@zef1611 did you find the batch size, number of gpus and gpu type used in this project? |
@BishmoyPaul How did you train on the MSVD dataset? |
Thanks for sharing your code. Is it normal to get R1=30 with train_titles.py? After running the score fusion, the title matrix does not improve the video matrix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: