You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
On November 12, ECMWF released version 49r1 of the operational IFS. Despite all the improvements, they modified the soil variables (temperature and moisture) which broke the ECMWF Vtable that had been released in the 4.6.0 version of the WPS.
I contacted the ECMWF team and they gave me this feedback. It is necessary to make a change within Ungrib, more specifically in the rd_grib2.F code so that it works with the new IFS soil variables.
With 49R1 cycle, encoding of soild parameters changed
ECMWF is currently one of the best global weather forecasting models. It is essential to have this data working in WRF so that regional weather centers can run WRF for their area of interest. Could you take a look and try to find a solution to this problem?
Best Regards,
Gabriel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
On November 12, ECMWF released version 49r1 of the operational IFS. Despite all the improvements, they modified the soil variables (temperature and moisture) which broke the ECMWF Vtable that had been released in the 4.6.0 version of the WPS.
I contacted the ECMWF team and they gave me this feedback. It is necessary to make a change within Ungrib, more specifically in the rd_grib2.F code so that it works with the new IFS soil variables.
With 49R1 cycle, encoding of soild parameters changed
ECMWF is currently one of the best global weather forecasting models. It is essential to have this data working in WRF so that regional weather centers can run WRF for their area of interest. Could you take a look and try to find a solution to this problem?
Best Regards,
Gabriel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: