You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I just noticed this repo, and am really impressed with the amount of work put into this! Out of curiosity I decided to compare these sound changes to the simple Latin→Portuguese changes I distributed as an example with Brassica (themselves a mere translation of the default changes for zompist’s SCA²). Here’s what I got:
Latin word
SCA²/Brassica changes
This repo
lector
leitor
léctor
doctor
doutor
doctor
focus
fogo
foca
jocus
jogo
joca
districtus
distrito
districtos
cīvitatem
cidade
civitadê
adoptare
adotar
adoptar
opera
obra
opéra
secundus
segundo
sécndos
fīliam
filha
filha
pōntem
ponte
pontê
Although I know little Latin and less Portuguese, some of the outputs in the final column don’t look quite right to me; certainly, only one is the same as the corresponding output in the middle column. Clearly one of these sets of changes must have an error somewhere, either yours or mine (or both, of course)… but which one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
All of yours are definitely correct, I probably am not handling something important or I ended up breaking something while experimenting with it (probably the latter), I haven't looked into this for a fairly long time and it was mostly a learning exercise, I'd have to take a look into it later.
I just noticed this repo, and am really impressed with the amount of work put into this! Out of curiosity I decided to compare these sound changes to the simple Latin→Portuguese changes I distributed as an example with Brassica (themselves a mere translation of the default changes for zompist’s SCA²). Here’s what I got:
Although I know little Latin and less Portuguese, some of the outputs in the final column don’t look quite right to me; certainly, only one is the same as the corresponding output in the middle column. Clearly one of these sets of changes must have an error somewhere, either yours or mine (or both, of course)… but which one?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: