feat: update file upload and download mechanism on toolset #1124
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 19e16a9 in 50 seconds
More details
- Looked at
514lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. python/composio/tools/toolset.py:702
- Draft comment:
Typo in function name_process_respone. Consider renaming it to_process_responsefor consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
2. python/composio/tools/toolset.py:584
- Draft comment:
The_ensure_output_dir_existsfunction is removed, but its functionality is still needed to ensure the output directory exists before writing files. Consider adding a check to ensure the directory exists before writing files. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. python/composio/client/collections.py:1246
- Draft comment:
Theoutput_in_filefunctionality is removed. If this feature is still needed, consider re-implementing it or providing an alternative solution. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_19tVYVciSn6HjqBJ
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
WalkthroughThis update enhances the Composio toolset by improving file upload and download capabilities. It introduces new attributes to the Changes
🔗 Related PRs
Entelligence.ai can learn from your feedback. Simply add 👍 / 👎 emojis to teach it your preferences. More shortcuts belowEmoji Descriptions:
Interact with the Bot:
|
![entelligence-ai-pr-reviews[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/932812?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| "connectedAccountId": connected_account, | ||
| "entityId": entity_id, | ||
| "appName": action.app, | ||
| "input": modified_params, | ||
| "input": params, | ||
| "text": text, | ||
| "authConfig": self._serialize_auth(auth=auth), | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: Verify the necessity of 'modified_params' before reverting to 'params' to prevent potential logical errors.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- "input": params,
+ "input": modified_params,📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| "connectedAccountId": connected_account, | |
| "entityId": entity_id, | |
| "appName": action.app, | |
| "input": modified_params, | |
| "input": params, | |
| "text": text, | |
| "authConfig": self._serialize_auth(auth=auth), | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "connectedAccountId": connected_account, | |
| "entityId": entity_id, | |
| "appName": action.app, | |
| "input": modified_params, # Ensure modified_params is correctly set and validated | |
| "text": text, | |
| "authConfig": self._serialize_auth(auth=auth), | |
| } |
|
|
||
| return processed | ||
|
|
||
| def _process_respone( | ||
| def _process_response( | ||
| self, action: Action, response: t.Dict | ||
| ) -> t.Union[t.Dict, _Retry]: | ||
| processed = self._process( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: Correct the function name typo to ensure consistency and avoid errors.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- def _process_respone(
+ def _process_response(📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| return processed | |
| def _process_respone( | |
| def _process_response( | |
| self, action: Action, response: t.Dict | |
| ) -> t.Union[t.Dict, _Retry]: | |
| processed = self._process( | |
| def _process_response( | |
| self, action: Action, response: t.Dict | |
| ) -> t.Union[t.Dict, _Retry]: | |
| processed = self._process(action, response) | |
| return processed |
python/composio/tools/toolset.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| def _substitute_file_upload_data(self, action: Action, params: t.Dict) -> t.Dict: | ||
| _schema = self._action_schemas.get(action.slug) | ||
| if _schema is None: | ||
| (_schema,) = self.get_action_schemas(actions=[action]) | ||
|
|
||
| if _schema.parameters.file_uploadable: | ||
| return self._load_file_as_param(_path=params["file"]) | ||
|
|
||
| return self._substitute_file_upload_data_recursively( | ||
| params=params, | ||
| schema=_schema.model_dump().pop("parameters"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: Ensure _substitute_file_upload_data handles all file upload scenarios without regressions. Test thoroughly with diverse inputs.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
+ def _substitute_file_upload_data(self, action: Action, params: t.Dict) -> t.Dict:
+ _schema = self._action_schemas.get(action.slug)
+ if _schema is None:
+ (_schema,) = self.get_action_schemas(actions=[action])
+ if _schema.parameters.file_uploadable:
+ return self._load_file_as_param(_path=params.get("file", ""))
+ return self._substitute_file_upload_data_recursively(
+ params=params,
+ schema=_schema.model_dump().pop("parameters"),
+ )📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| def _substitute_file_upload_data(self, action: Action, params: t.Dict) -> t.Dict: | |
| _schema = self._action_schemas.get(action.slug) | |
| if _schema is None: | |
| (_schema,) = self.get_action_schemas(actions=[action]) | |
| if _schema.parameters.file_uploadable: | |
| return self._load_file_as_param(_path=params["file"]) | |
| return self._substitute_file_upload_data_recursively( | |
| params=params, | |
| schema=_schema.model_dump().pop("parameters"), | |
| def _substitute_file_upload_data(self, action: Action, params: t.Dict) -> t.Dict: | |
| _schema = self._action_schemas.get(action.slug) | |
| if _schema is None: | |
| (_schema,) = self.get_action_schemas(actions=[action]) | |
| if _schema.parameters.file_uploadable: | |
| file_path = params.get("file", "") | |
| if not file_path: | |
| raise ValueError("File path is required for file uploadable actions.") | |
| return self._load_file_as_param(_path=file_path) | |
| return self._substitute_file_upload_data_recursively( | |
| params=params, | |
| schema=_schema.model_dump().pop("parameters"), | |
| ) |
python/composio/tools/toolset.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| def _substitute_file_download_data_recursively( | ||
| self, | ||
| schema: t.Dict, | ||
| response: t.Dict, | ||
| action: Action, | ||
| ) -> t.Dict: | ||
| for key in schema["properties"]: | ||
| if self._is_file_downloadable(schema=schema["properties"][key]): | ||
| response[key] = self._store_response_file( | ||
| action=action.slug, | ||
| response=response[key], | ||
| ) | ||
| continue | ||
|
|
||
| if "type" not in schema["properties"][key]: | ||
| continue | ||
|
|
||
| if schema["properties"][key]["type"] == "object": | ||
| response[key] = self._substitute_file_download_data_recursively( | ||
| schema=schema["properties"][key], | ||
| response=response[key], | ||
| action=action, | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Refactor: Refactor _substitute_file_download_data_recursively to an iterative approach to prevent stack overflow in deeply nested schemas.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
def _substitute_file_download_data_iteratively(self, schema: t.Dict, response: t.Dict, action: Action) -> t.Dict:
stack = [(schema, response)]
while stack:
current_schema, current_response = stack.pop()
for key in current_schema['properties']:
if self._is_file_downloadable(schema=current_schema['properties'][key]):
current_response[key] = self._store_response_file(
action=action.slug,
response=current_response[key],
)
elif 'type' in current_schema['properties'][key] and current_schema['properties'][key]['type'] == 'object':
stack.append((current_schema['properties'][key], current_response[key]))
return response📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| def _substitute_file_download_data_recursively( | |
| self, | |
| schema: t.Dict, | |
| response: t.Dict, | |
| action: Action, | |
| ) -> t.Dict: | |
| for key in schema["properties"]: | |
| if self._is_file_downloadable(schema=schema["properties"][key]): | |
| response[key] = self._store_response_file( | |
| action=action.slug, | |
| response=response[key], | |
| ) | |
| continue | |
| if "type" not in schema["properties"][key]: | |
| continue | |
| if schema["properties"][key]["type"] == "object": | |
| response[key] = self._substitute_file_download_data_recursively( | |
| schema=schema["properties"][key], | |
| response=response[key], | |
| action=action, | |
| ) | |
| def _substitute_file_download_data_iteratively(self, schema: t.Dict, response: t.Dict, action: Action) -> t.Dict: | |
| stack = [(schema, response)] | |
| while stack: | |
| current_schema, current_response = stack.pop() | |
| for key in current_schema['properties']: | |
| if self._is_file_downloadable(schema=current_schema['properties'][key]): | |
| current_response[key] = self._store_response_file( | |
| action=action.slug, | |
| response=current_response[key], | |
| ) | |
| elif 'type' in current_schema['properties'][key] and current_schema['properties'][key]['type'] == 'object': | |
| stack.append((current_schema['properties'][key], current_response[key])) | |
| return response |
python/composio/tools/toolset.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| def _substitute_file_download_data( | ||
| self, | ||
| action: Action, | ||
| response: t.Dict, | ||
| ) -> t.Dict: | ||
| if not response["successfull"]: | ||
| return response | ||
|
|
||
| _schema = self._action_schemas.get(action.slug) | ||
| if _schema is None: | ||
| (_schema,) = self.get_action_schemas(actions=[action]) | ||
|
|
||
| if _schema.response.file_downloadable: | ||
| return { | ||
| "output_file": self._store_response_file( | ||
| action=action.slug, | ||
| response=response.pop("data"), | ||
| ), | ||
| **response, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| **response, | ||
| "data": self._substitute_file_download_data_recursively( | ||
| schema=_schema.response.model_dump(), | ||
| response=response["data"], | ||
| action=action, | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: Add a check for 'data' in the response to prevent KeyError.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
def _substitute_file_download_data(
self,
action: Action,
response: t.Dict,
) -> t.Dict:
if not response.get("successfull"):
return response
+ if "data" not in response:
+ self.logger.error("Missing 'data' in response")
+ return response
_schema = self._action_schemas.get(action.slug)
if _schema is None:
(_schema,) = self.get_action_schemas(actions=[action])
if _schema.response.file_downloadable:
return {
"output_file": self._store_response_file(
action=action.slug,
response=response.pop("data"),
),
**response,
}
return {
**response,
"data": self._substitute_file_download_data_recursively(
schema=_schema.response.model_dump(),
response=response["data"],
action=action,
),
}📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| def _substitute_file_download_data( | |
| self, | |
| action: Action, | |
| response: t.Dict, | |
| ) -> t.Dict: | |
| if not response["successfull"]: | |
| return response | |
| _schema = self._action_schemas.get(action.slug) | |
| if _schema is None: | |
| (_schema,) = self.get_action_schemas(actions=[action]) | |
| if _schema.response.file_downloadable: | |
| return { | |
| "output_file": self._store_response_file( | |
| action=action.slug, | |
| response=response.pop("data"), | |
| ), | |
| **response, | |
| } | |
| return { | |
| **response, | |
| "data": self._substitute_file_download_data_recursively( | |
| schema=_schema.response.model_dump(), | |
| response=response["data"], | |
| action=action, | |
| ), | |
| def _substitute_file_download_data( | |
| self, | |
| action: Action, | |
| response: t.Dict, | |
| ) -> t.Dict: | |
| if not response.get("successfull"): | |
| return response | |
| if "data" not in response: | |
| self.logger.error("Missing 'data' in response") | |
| return response | |
| _schema = self._action_schemas.get(action.slug) | |
| if _schema is None: | |
| (_schema,) = self.get_action_schemas(actions=[action]) | |
| if _schema.response.file_downloadable: | |
| return { | |
| "output_file": self._store_response_file( | |
| action=action.slug, | |
| response=response.pop("data"), | |
| ), | |
| **response, | |
| } | |
| return { | |
| **response, | |
| "data": self._substitute_file_download_data_recursively( | |
| schema=_schema.response.model_dump(), | |
| response=response["data"], | |
| action=action, | |
| ), | |
| } | |
| processed_response = ( | ||
| response | ||
| if action.is_runtime | ||
| else self._process_respone(action=action, response=response) | ||
| else self._process_response(action=action, response=response) | ||
| ) | ||
| if isinstance(processed_response, _Retry): | ||
| self.logger.debug( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: Correct the function name typo to prevent runtime errors.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- else self._process_respone(action=action, response=response)
+ else self._process_response(action=action, response=response)📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| processed_response = ( | |
| response | |
| if action.is_runtime | |
| else self._process_respone(action=action, response=response) | |
| else self._process_response(action=action, response=response) | |
| ) | |
| if isinstance(processed_response, _Retry): | |
| self.logger.debug( | |
| processed_response = ( | |
| response | |
| if action.is_runtime | |
| else self._process_response(action=action, response=response) | |
| ) | |
| if isinstance(processed_response, _Retry): | |
| self.logger.debug( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 944e2ef in 55 seconds
More details
- Looked at
171lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. python/composio/tools/toolset.py:848
- Draft comment:
The method_substitute_file_upload_datauses a hardcoded key 'file' to access the file path inparams. Consider dynamically determining the key based on the schema properties to avoid potential issues if the file parameter is named differently. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. python/composio/tools/toolset.py:985
- Draft comment:
Good practice in handlingInvalidFileProvidedexception by returning detailed error information as a dictionary. This approach enhances error transparency for the caller. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%
TheInvalidFileProvidedexception is being caught and returned as a dictionary in theexecute_actionmethod. This is a good practice for handling exceptions gracefully and providing detailed error information to the caller.
Workflow ID: wflow_2YKZMiNSUYk5HBuq
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
|
|
||
| def _substitute_file_upload_data_recursively( | ||
| self, | ||
| params: t.Dict, | ||
| schema: t.Dict, | ||
| ) -> t.Dict: | ||
| for key in schema["properties"]: | ||
| if self._is_file_uploadable(properties=schema["properties"][key]): | ||
| params[key] = self._load_file_as_param( | ||
| _path=params[key], | ||
| _accept=schema["properties"][key].get("accept", ["*/*"]), | ||
| ) | ||
| continue | ||
|
|
||
| if schema["properties"][key]["type"] == "object": | ||
| params[key] = self._substitute_file_upload_data_recursively( | ||
| params=params[key], | ||
| schema=schema["properties"][key], | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential Issue: The method _substitute_file_upload_data_recursively uses recursion to handle nested schemas, which can lead to stack overflow errors if the schema is deeply nested. This is a performance concern that should be addressed to ensure robustness.
Suggestions:
- Iterative Approach: Consider refactoring the method to use an iterative approach, which can handle deeply nested structures without the risk of stack overflow.
- Recursion Depth Check: If recursion is preferred, implement a maximum recursion depth check to prevent stack overflow errors.
By addressing this issue, the code will be more resilient and performant, especially when dealing with complex schemas.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
def _substitute_file_upload_data_iteratively(self, params: t.Dict, schema: t.Dict) -> t.Dict:
stack = [(params, schema)]
while stack:
current_params, current_schema = stack.pop()
for key in current_schema["properties"]:
if self._is_file_uploadable(properties=current_schema["properties"][key]):
current_params[key] = self._load_file_as_param(
_path=current_params[key],
_accept=current_schema["properties"][key].get("accept", ["*/*"]),
)
elif current_schema["properties"][key]["type"] == "object":
stack.append((current_params[key], current_schema["properties"][key]))
return params📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| def _substitute_file_upload_data_recursively( | |
| self, | |
| params: t.Dict, | |
| schema: t.Dict, | |
| ) -> t.Dict: | |
| for key in schema["properties"]: | |
| if self._is_file_uploadable(properties=schema["properties"][key]): | |
| params[key] = self._load_file_as_param( | |
| _path=params[key], | |
| _accept=schema["properties"][key].get("accept", ["*/*"]), | |
| ) | |
| continue | |
| if schema["properties"][key]["type"] == "object": | |
| params[key] = self._substitute_file_upload_data_recursively( | |
| params=params[key], | |
| schema=schema["properties"][key], | |
| ) | |
| def _substitute_file_upload_data_iteratively(self, params: t.Dict, schema: t.Dict) -> t.Dict: | |
| stack = [(params, schema)] | |
| while stack: | |
| current_params, current_schema = stack.pop() | |
| for key in current_schema["properties"]: | |
| if self._is_file_uploadable(properties=current_schema["properties"][key]): | |
| current_params[key] = self._load_file_as_param( | |
| _path=current_params[key], | |
| _accept=current_schema["properties"][key].get("accept", ["*/*"]), | |
| ) | |
| elif current_schema["properties"][key]["type"] == "object": | |
| stack.append((current_params[key], current_schema["properties"][key])) | |
| return params |
| ) | ||
| try: | ||
| params = self._substitute_file_upload_data(action=action, params=params) | ||
| except InvalidFileProvided as e: | ||
| return { | ||
| "successful": False, | ||
| "error": e.message, | ||
| "file": e.file, | ||
| "allowed": e.allowed, | ||
| "mimetype": e.mimetype, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The recent code change introduces a new exception handling mechanism for invalid file uploads, which is a significant alteration in the file handling logic. This change could potentially impact existing workflows by introducing a new exception that might not be handled elsewhere in the code.
Actionable Suggestions:
- Review the
InvalidFileProvidedException: Ensure that this exception is well-integrated with the existing file upload logic. Verify that it is raised and caught appropriately across all relevant parts of the code. - Comprehensive Testing: Conduct thorough testing to cover all possible scenarios where this exception might be triggered. This includes testing with various file types, sizes, and invalid inputs.
- User Feedback: Ensure that the error messages provided by this exception are clear and informative, aiding in debugging and providing useful feedback to users.
- Documentation: Update any relevant documentation to reflect this new exception handling mechanism, ensuring that developers and users are aware of the change.
By addressing these points, you can ensure that the new logic is robust and does not introduce regressions or unexpected behavior.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
+ try:
+ params = self._substitute_file_upload_data(action=action, params=params)
+ except InvalidFileProvided as e:
+ return {
+ "successful": False,
+ "error": e.message,
+ "file": e.file,
+ "allowed": e.allowed,
+ "mimetype": e.mimetype,
+ }📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| ) | |
| try: | |
| params = self._substitute_file_upload_data(action=action, params=params) | |
| except InvalidFileProvided as e: | |
| return { | |
| "successful": False, | |
| "error": e.message, | |
| "file": e.file, | |
| "allowed": e.allowed, | |
| "mimetype": e.mimetype, | |
| try: | |
| params = self._substitute_file_upload_data(action=action, params=params) | |
| except InvalidFileProvided as e: | |
| return { | |
| "successful": False, | |
| "error": str(e), # Ensure the error message is a string | |
| "file": e.file, | |
| "allowed": e.allowed, | |
| "mimetype": e.mimetype, | |
| } |
| processed_response = ( | ||
| response | ||
| if action.is_runtime | ||
| else self._process_respone(action=action, response=response) | ||
| else self._process_response(action=action, response=response) | ||
| ) | ||
| if isinstance(processed_response, _Retry): | ||
| self.logger.debug( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bug Fix: The identified issue is a typographical error in the method name _process_respone, which has been corrected to _process_response. This correction is crucial as the typo could lead to a NameError, potentially breaking the functionality if the incorrect method name is called elsewhere in the code.
Actionable Steps:
- Ensure that all instances of
_process_responein the codebase are updated to_process_responseto prevent runtime errors. - Conduct a thorough search across the codebase to confirm no other occurrences of the typo exist.
This change is critical to maintain the integrity of the code and prevent unexpected errors during execution.
🔧 Suggested Code Diff:
- else self._process_respone(action=action, response=response)
+ else self._process_response(action=action, response=response)📝 Committable Code Suggestion
‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| processed_response = ( | |
| response | |
| if action.is_runtime | |
| else self._process_respone(action=action, response=response) | |
| else self._process_response(action=action, response=response) | |
| ) | |
| if isinstance(processed_response, _Retry): | |
| self.logger.debug( | |
| processed_response = ( | |
| response | |
| if action.is_runtime | |
| else self._process_response(action=action, response=response) | |
| ) | |
| if isinstance(processed_response, _Retry): | |
| self.logger.debug( |
| action: Action, | ||
| response: t.Dict, | ||
| ) -> t.Dict: | ||
| if not response["successfull"]: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we are passing successful also now. Should we use that now?
cc: @utkarsh-dixit
|
|
||
| return params | ||
|
|
||
| def _substitute_file_upload_data(self, action: Action, params: t.Dict) -> t.Dict: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Two related bugs were introduced in file upload handling:
In _substitute_file_upload_data(), when file_uploadable is True, the method returns only the file parameter, discarding other parameters. This means actions requiring multiple parameters will fail because non-file parameters are omitted.
In Actions.execute(), the previous file parameter processing logic was removed. This breaks file upload functionality, as file paths are now sent as raw strings instead of being properly read, encoded, and formatted for upload.
These changes prevent correct file uploads and break backward compatibility for actions that require file parameters.
| @@ -1086,6 +1191,8 @@ def get_action_schemas( | |||
| if item.name == Action.ANTHROPIC_TEXT_EDITOR.slug: | |||
| item.name = "str_replace_editor" | |||
|
|
|||
| self._action_schemas[item.name] = item | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
A schema retrieval bug occurs in the get_actions_schemas method where action schemas are stored using item.name (e.g., 'bash'), but later retrieved using action.slug (e.g., 'anthropic_bash_command'). This inconsistency causes schema lookup to fail when retrieving action schemas, potentially leading to incorrect processing of file uploads and downloads. Specifically, methods like _substitute_file_upload_data and _substitute_file_download_data may encounter None schemas due to this mismatched key usage.
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| if self.output_in_file: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We are removing this functionality?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 671e393 in 20 seconds
More details
- Looked at
65lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. python/composio/tools/toolset.py:923
- Draft comment:
Typo in key 'successfull'. It should be 'successful'. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a valid diff hunk.
Workflow ID: wflow_3ABYEQpoEdz9hAAf
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on 72314fa in 16 seconds
More details
- Looked at
25lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1drafted comments based on config settings.
1. python/composio/tools/toolset.py:855
- Draft comment:
Refactored to usemodel_dump()directly on_schema.parameters, which is a more direct and efficient approach. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%
The change in line 855 is a refactor to use the correct method for dumping the schema model. This aligns with the PR description's intent to improve schema processing.
Workflow ID: wflow_nwudTfrWoEnIS3t9
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
🔍 Review Summary
Purpose:
Changes:
Enhancement:
file_uploadableandfile_downloadableattributes to streamline file path and content handling.Refactor:
executefunction by removing redundant logic.Impact:
Original Description