Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[no ci] fix missing include headers #649

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ipatch
Copy link
Collaborator

@ipatch ipatch commented Dec 19, 2024

  • freecad@1.0.0_py312: scaffold out new version of freecad formula

  • freecad@1.0.0_py312: rbme: update .rubocop.yml and more scaffolding

  • rbme: freecad@1.0.0_py312: rm old hdf5 patch

  • rbme: freecad@1.0.0_py312: rm bottle block and update patch block with newer hdf5 patch for head block

  • rbme: freecad@1.0.0_py312: mv tbb from build dep to run dep, add new caveat

  • freecad@1.0.0_py312: rbme: update grammar in comment, and use 1.0 tarball release

  • rbme: freecad@1.0.0_py312: still need xercesc patch for linuxbrew

  • rbme: freecad@1.0.0_py312: add xercesc patch for head and add TODO item

  • [no ci] freecad@1.0.0_py312: checkin new patch file to resolve the missing glu.h header file and others

  • Have you ensured that your commits follow the commit style guide?

brew style freecad/freecad/[NAME_OF_FORMULA_FILE] 

output from running above command should output something similiar to the below

1 file inspected, no offenses detected
  • Have you ensured your commit passed audit checks, ie.
brew audit freecad/freecad/[NAME_OF_FORMULA_FILE] --online --new-formula

Not all PRs require passing these checks ie. adding [no ci] in the commit message will prevent the CI from running but PRs that change formula files generally should run through the CI checks that way new bottles are built and uploaded to the repository thus not having to build all formula from source but rather installing from a bottle (significantly faster 🐰 ... 🐢)

For more information about this template file learn more

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant