Remove CPT

[Affie]

close #1562

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1615 (df40b19) into master (f3864a5) will increase coverage by 20.90%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1615       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   56.56%   77.46%   +20.90%     
===========================================
  Files          73       73               
  Lines        5095     5406      +311     
===========================================
+ Hits         2882     4188     +1306     
+ Misses       2213     1218      -995     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/entities/FactorOperationalMemory.jl	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/services/CalcFactor.jl	88.33% <100.00%> (+3.65%)	⬆️
src/services/DeconvUtils.jl	68.96% <100.00%> (+68.96%)	⬆️
src/services/EvalFactor.jl	85.63% <100.00%> (+10.35%)	⬆️
src/services/NumericalCalculations.jl	92.47% <100.00%> (+23.65%)	⬆️
src/services/CompareUtils.jl	15.00% <0.00%> (-0.79%)	⬇️
src/NeedsResolution.jl	7.14% <0.00%> (-0.55%)	⬇️
src/Deprecated.jl	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/ODE/DERelative.jl	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
src/entities/CliqueTypes.jl	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 53 more

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[dehann]

Good for removing CPT. This PR does create the technical debt of using future thread specific memory in CCW. So the old CPT fields will have to be removed from CCW again.

[Affie]

Good for removing CPT. This PR does create the technical debt of using future thread specific memory in CCW. So the old CPT fields will have to be removed from CCW again.

Technical debt can be captured here #1616

[dehann]

thanks Johan, you can merge this one too when you are ready.