Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not use jarvis on Python 3.13 #2207

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ml-evs
Copy link
Member

@ml-evs ml-evs commented Jan 4, 2025

Failing in CI recently for some reason, not worth the effort to support 3.13 and at some point should be removed.

@ml-evs ml-evs requested a review from CasperWA as a code owner January 4, 2025 13:52
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@5626c74). Learn more about missing BASE report.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2207   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   90.69%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       75           
  Lines           ?     4858           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     4406           
  Misses          ?      452           
  Partials        ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
project 90.69% <ø> (?)
validator 90.69% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ml-evs ml-evs merged commit 84efbe2 into main Jan 4, 2025
13 checks passed
@ml-evs ml-evs deleted the ml-evs/jarvis-disallow-3.13 branch January 4, 2025 14:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant