Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update request: [BACKPORT] Ryujinx 1298 → 1398 #345410

Closed
1 task done
Redhawk18 opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
1 task done

Update request: [BACKPORT] Ryujinx 1298 → 1398 #345410

Redhawk18 opened this issue Sep 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
9.needs: package (update) This needs a package to be updated

Comments

@Redhawk18
Copy link
Contributor

  • Package name: Ryujinx
  • Latest released version: 1398
  • Current version on the unstable channel: 1398
  • Current version on the stable/release channel: 1298

Notify maintainers
@06kellyjac
@artemist


Note for maintainers: Please tag this issue in your PR.
backport

Add a 👍 reaction to issues you find important.

@Redhawk18 Redhawk18 added the 9.needs: package (update) This needs a package to be updated label Sep 30, 2024
@Naxdy Naxdy mentioned this issue Oct 2, 2024
13 tasks
Nabile-Rahmani added a commit to Nabile-Rahmani/nixpkgs that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2024
Should fix source builds by relying on our beloved archive.org to host a [SHA256-matching tarball generated from a mirror of the repo](https://archive.org/details/ryujinx-5dbba-07e-33e-83c-9047dcbb-701c-9655edbbe-89086.tar).

I have only `nix repl`'d the fetchTarball expression for its consistency check, as I do not currently have the time nor storage to build the package locally, sorry about that.

We could also generate archives to address NixOS#345410 and the 24.05 branch.

Supersedes: NixOS#345881
@FliegendeWurst
Copy link
Member

Done in #346714

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
9.needs: package (update) This needs a package to be updated
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants