Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 368702 to release 24.11] koboldcpp: 1.79.1 -> 1.81 #369092

Merged

Conversation

DontEatOreo
Copy link
Member

Backports:
#366837
#368702

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

(cherry picked from commit eb01892)
(cherry picked from commit 4bd5e1d)
Upstream dropped `openblass` since v1.75

(cherry picked from commit 415fe80)
Bump up minimum version, so no APIs are missing

(cherry picked from commit e62a47c)
It's causing build failure

(cherry picked from commit 1ccd253)
@DontEatOreo
Copy link
Member Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 369092 --extra-nixpkgs-config '{ allowAliases = false; allowBroken = false; allowUnfree = true; checkMeta = true; cudaSupport = true; cudaCapabilities = [ "7.5" ]; cudaArches = [ "sm_75" ]; }'


x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • koboldcpp

@DontEatOreo
Copy link
Member Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 369092


x86_64-darwin

✅ 1 package built:
  • koboldcpp

aarch64-darwin

✅ 1 package built:
  • koboldcpp

@DontEatOreo
Copy link
Member Author

https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/6cb2d2c372e4f7c10fd9c8b07e8bcbb0

ofborg is unhappy about Mono? This package doesn't use Mono at all, so it seems like it's a CI/CD issue...

@JohnRTitor
Copy link
Contributor

It's a target branch issue, unrelated to this PR, but should still be fixed, perhaps we/someone else forgot to backport a particular commit or broke the eval somehow.

Copy link
Contributor

@JohnRTitor JohnRTitor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You sure you want to include this commit? d2cddf9

According to #366837 (comment), darwin sdk on release-24.11 is still 10.12.

@DontEatOreo DontEatOreo force-pushed the backport-368702-to-release-24.11 branch from 4619c34 to 5d1542a Compare January 1, 2025 12:12
@DontEatOreo
Copy link
Member Author

@JohnRTitor Thanks for catching this! Yea you're right I removed the revert for Darwin SDK

@DontEatOreo
Copy link
Member Author

@ofborg eval

@JohnRTitor
Copy link
Contributor

@ofborg build koboldcpp

@DontEatOreo DontEatOreo changed the title [Backport 368702 to release 24.11] koboldcpp: 1.79.1 -> 1.80.3 [Backport 368702 to release 24.11] koboldcpp: 1.79.1 -> 1.81 Jan 7, 2025
@DontEatOreo
Copy link
Member Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 369092 --extra-nixpkgs-config '{ allowAliases = false; allowBroken = false; allowUnfree = true; checkMeta = true; cudaSupport = true; cudaCapabilities = [ "7.5" ]; cudaArches = [ "sm_75" ]; }'


x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • koboldcpp

@DontEatOreo
Copy link
Member Author

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/12652279354/job/35254578314?pr=369092 can be ignored it's complaining that I didn't backport the treewide change

@JohnRTitor JohnRTitor merged commit 0d07e09 into NixOS:release-24.11 Jan 8, 2025
27 of 32 checks passed
@DontEatOreo DontEatOreo deleted the backport-368702-to-release-24.11 branch January 8, 2025 21:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants