Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[15.0][FIX] fleet_vehicle_log_fuel: Don't replace whole SQL view + make it work + renaming #138

Merged

Conversation

pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Replacing whole SQL view definition is totally incompatible with other modules adding things to this report. We use a trick for replacing only some parts retrieving the current SQL view for keeping the inheritability.

We need as well to add the new selection value.

Finally, a renaming of the model file for proper recognition has been done.

@Tecnativa TT48062

…work + renaming

Replacing whole SQL view definition is totally incompatible with other
modules adding things to this report. We use a trick for replacing
only some parts retrieving the current SQL view for keeping the
inheritability.

We need as well to add the new selection value.

Finally, a renaming of the model file for proper recognition has been
done.

TT48062
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Thanks :)

@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member Author

/ocabot merge major

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hey, thanks for contributing! Proceeding to merge this for you.
Prepared branch 15.0-ocabot-merge-pr-138-by-pedrobaeza-bump-major, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 5c117bf into OCA:15.0 Mar 1, 2024
5 of 7 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at a33ea74. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza deleted the 15.0-fix-fleet_vehicle_log_fuel-report branch March 1, 2024 11:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants