-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 732
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[16.0][IMP] stock_inventory_discrepancy: better inheritance #2232
base: 16.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[16.0][IMP] stock_inventory_discrepancy: better inheritance #2232
Conversation
@HviorForgeFlow Any reason not to revert back to this more common way? |
a6f5c1d
to
bfd7067
Compare
No, I guess it was a decision without taking a count a possible inheritance. It makes more sense move it away from a hook. |
bfd7067
to
3a0c20a
Compare
During the migration to 13.0 of this module it was decided to introduce a hook. Refactoring to a regular override plays better with inheritance.
3a0c20a
to
dcfd0dc
Compare
Now green |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code review.
Yes, indeed, no need of patch in this case.
During the migration to 13.0 of this module it was decided to introduce a hook.
Refactoring to a regular override plays better with inheritance.