more explanations on settings #367
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
and back-reference for "show copybooks on hover"
|
|
|
requesting review from @nberth - feel free to move those changes to a different file in the case of generated package.json; but note that the "special line breaks" double+space, then lf do an "actual" line break, so those should be kept |
nberth
reviewed
Sep 6, 2024
|
@nberth: any updates on this? I'm not sure if #368 is likely to be finished soon and have a "frontend" in the vscode extension (it definitely sounds interesting), but with all the other important changes since the last release I'd like to see 0.1.4 going out "rather soon" - and thise one seems like a low hanging fruit before... |
nberth
reviewed
Oct 21, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
and back-reference for "show copybooks on hover"
this originates on me wondering why it did not work "as suggested by the README".
Question: Wouldn't it be reasonable for the LSP to have a list of the file names and if there's only a single one to match the copybook for hover/show definition`?
This would lead to most environments working "out of the box".