Fix form for customizing superbol.path

[Stevendeo]

This PR fixes the superbol.path form that was not displayed because of a type error.

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[nberth]

This form seemed to show correctly to me before. Was there a specific issue with its rendering?

While we are at it, is there a way to be more specific, and, for instance, tell it's a(n existing) directory that we'd want in this field?

[Stevendeo]

This form seemed to show correctly to me before. Was there a specific issue with its rendering?

On my side, it displays a link to the settings.json file to edit the option manually. Which version of vscode do you use? I am using 1.82.2.

While we are at it, is there a way to be more specific, and, for instance, tell it's a(n existing) directory that we'd want in this field?

I'm trying to make variable substitution work, the doc says something like ${env:PATH} should work, but it does not (at least on my version).

[nberth]

On my side, it displays a link to the settings.json file to edit the option manually. Which version of vscode do you use? I am using 1.82.2.

Hum not good news: I'm using 1.80.0. So I assume the current specs are a just becoming out-dated.

[Stevendeo]

Variable substitution does not seem to work either on the last version (1.83.1), it would have been too easy 😅

[Stevendeo]

Good thing, though: putting superbol alone in the field seems to be sufficient.

EDIT : #75 adresses the issue

[GitMensch]

Always good to follow the specs for package.json :-)
Please improve the one description and the types for the others.

[GitMensch]

please adjust that, maybe something like "name of superbol command/binary to use, may be full path", at least that would tell me that I can either use something that's on the environment specific PATH or a full path.

[nberth]

This does not seem to convey the idea that one can put an executable name that will be searched in PATH. Is it actually allowed?

[GitMensch]

Yes, it is allowed

[nberth]

Then I'd suggest something like "Name of the superbol executable if available in PATH; otherwise, may be an absolute path."

[GitMensch]

@nberth If you want changes to this PR then please review requesting changes. Otherwise I suggest to pull this in to get the type error fixed (we can easily adjust the description later).

[nberth]

One small suggestion and we can pull this in ;-)

[nberth]

Then I'd suggest something like "Name of the superbol executable if available in PATH; otherwise, may be an absolute path."

Oups

[nberth]

Wrong button on previous review: actually requesting a change.

[nberth]

Ok to merge after fixing typo ;-)