Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add manager information from node BMC #62

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024
Merged

Add manager information from node BMC #62

merged 8 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

davidallendj
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds additional information to the collect output, including the MACAddr and Managers properties. The Managers property includes information found via the /redfish/v1/Managers endpoint as well as the manager's ethernet interfaces.

@davidallendj davidallendj requested a review from synackd October 15, 2024 20:08
@davidallendj davidallendj self-assigned this Oct 15, 2024
internal/collect.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@alexlovelltroy alexlovelltroy added the not ready for review For PRs that are not ready for review label Oct 24, 2024
@synackd synackd removed the not ready for review For PRs that are not ready for review label Oct 24, 2024
@synackd
Copy link
Contributor

synackd commented Oct 24, 2024

@davidallendj Looks like this has conflicts that need to be resolved. Adding the "not ready for review" label again until this is fixed.

@synackd synackd added the not ready for review For PRs that are not ready for review label Oct 24, 2024
Signed-off-by: David Allen <16520934+davidallendj@users.noreply.github.com>
@synackd synackd removed the not ready for review For PRs that are not ready for review label Oct 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@synackd synackd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

These changes caused me to revisit #59. We should, in the near future, address how we should name things in an easy but flexible way. It's out of scope for this PR, of course, but it would be quite useful in general.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants