Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove base patch #71

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

AntonReinhard
Copy link
Member

@AntonReinhard AntonReinhard commented Oct 21, 2024

Merge after #69

This deletes the QEDbase patch which is no longer necessary as the relevant PR in QEDbase was merged.
Unfortunately, there seems to be a somewhat strange interaction of doubly defined typenames and @reexport, creating an issue in QEDbase's documentation building. This means that I had to remove some @extref statements for now that can be readded later, when QEDbase is ready.

@AntonReinhard
Copy link
Member Author

I think the unit test template was actually wrong, since it did not use dev version dependencies. I fixed this by taking the template from QEDprocesses.jl.

Generally, I think we should stop allowing patch.jl files in our dev branches. I think they're fine for drafting a PR and seeing if things work together, but they should not be committed since it is now relatively easy to put the patch upstream directly. An upstream release is not necessary anymore either.

@SimeonEhrig
Copy link
Member

@szabo137 Can you please review it. It is block the QEDbase 0.3 release.

@SimeonEhrig SimeonEhrig merged commit ea741b3 into QEDjl-project:dev Oct 23, 2024
4 checks passed
@AntonReinhard AntonReinhard deleted the remove-base-patch branch October 29, 2024 09:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants