Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cts enable obstruction aware #6541

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

arthurjolo
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request enables the CTS option obstruction_aware by default.
Also this PR enhances the obstruction_aware CTS to consider the tree topology during its legalization, trying to maintain the tree as similar to as it was originally build.

… consider the tree topology when legalizing

Signed-off-by: arthur <arthurjolo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: arthur <arthurjolo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: arthur <arthurjolo@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

… disable obstruction aware: -no_obstruction_aware

Signed-off-by: arthur <arthurjolo@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

1 similar comment
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Signed-off-by: arthurjolo <arthurjolo@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

Copy link
Contributor

@precisionmoon precisionmoon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reviewed the code changes with Arthur. They are fine.

Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@arthurjolo arthurjolo requested a review from maliberty January 23, 2025 23:38
@maliberty
Copy link
Member

The code looks fine. Is there an ORFS PR that needs coordinated merging?

@arthurjolo
Copy link
Contributor Author

arthurjolo commented Jan 24, 2025

I am waiting for a run with the new sta to finish to see if there is any
.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants