-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add geo polygon query type #613
Merged
+2,171
−1,490
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | ||
Geo-Polygon Query | ||
========================== | ||
|
||
A query that matches documents with geo point within a defined set of polygons. | ||
|
||
Polygon definitions must conform to the `GeoJson <https://geojson.org/>`_ standard. | ||
Polygons must not be self-crossing, otherwise may result in unexpected behavior. | ||
Polygons cannot cross the 180th meridian. Instead, use two polygons: one on each side. | ||
|
||
Proto definition: | ||
|
||
.. code-block:: | ||
|
||
message GeoPolygonQuery { | ||
// Field in the document to query | ||
string field = 1; | ||
// Geo polygons to search for containing points | ||
repeated Polygon polygons = 2; | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@aprudhomme should we add the restrictions mentioned in the notes in https://lucene.apache.org/core/8_4_0/core/org/apache/lucene/geo/Polygon.html ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The important ones are in the
Polygon
comments, but I can add them here too.I tried to do some digging, and it looks like some of the requirements have to do with conforming to the GeoJson spec. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7946#section-3.1.6 Oddly, the winding order in the spec looks like the opposite of the class notes. The spec also says it is ok to ignore the wrong winding order.
I also see that the lucene class detects the winding order in the constructor, so it really might not be vital to functionality. I think I will try writing some tests that use the opposite order, and relax the requirements if they work.