Rename method to avoid misleading readers #2489
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
destroyable_edition?
method had a misleading name, as it isn't aquerying method that returns a boolean value—it checks whether an
edition is destroyable and, if it isn't, shows a flash message and
redirects to the edition's show page.
There's already a similar method,
require_assignee_editable
, forchecking whether an edition can have its assignee updated, so rename
the method to be consistent with that one.