-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 214
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Override assertj version in codestart integration-test pom #2100
Conversation
…m the environment (apache#2093)" This reverts commit 13155de.
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
27 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
22 similar comments
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
ok to test |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs No Coverage information |
(tests) - kogito-runtimes job Test results:
Those are the test failures: org.kie.kogito.quarkus.dmn.KogitoDMNCodeCodestartIT.testContentjava.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'org.assertj.core.api.AbstractAssert org.assertj.core.api.AbstractPathAssert.satisfies(java.util.function.Consumer)'at org.kie.kogito.quarkus.dmn.KogitoDMNCodeCodestartIT.testContent(KogitoDMNCodeCodestartIT.java:53) |
This is on hold until we figure out why the version is not propagated at runtime. |
Hi @ia3andy, is this still relevant please? If yes, could you please rebase with the latest changes from main? |
A cleaner fix for the issue described in https://github.com/kiegroup/kogito-runtimes/pull/2093
Temporary override version from kogito-dependencies-bom to make sure it is api compatible with quarkus-devtools-testing
This reverts commit 13155de (from https://github.com/kiegroup/kogito-runtimes/pull/2093)