Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add variant for the ROBOTIS OpenRB-150. #724

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tomsrocketsandrobots
Copy link

This pull request adds support for the ROBOTIS OpenRB-150 board to the Arduino SAMD core. It includes the necessary variant files and linker scripts to enable compatibility with the SAMD21G18A microcontroller used on the board.

This change is needed to add support for the OpenRB-150 to PlatformIO. I will also be submitting a PR to this issue on platformio/platform-atmelsam to add the necessary json file to add the OpenRB-150 to platformIO's board explorer.

The changes were tested using the following methods:

  • Compiled and uploaded multiple sketches from the Dynamixel2Arduino library examples to the OpenRB-150 using the Arduino IDE.
  • Added the variant files to my local .platformio directory, manually ported the same arduino sketches into platformio projects, and tested to confirm the sketches upload properly using platformio IDE.

Please let me know if any additional changes are required!

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 28, 2024

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ tomsrocketsandrobots
❌ ktgilliam
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Add relevant section to boards.txt
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants