-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
breaking(Core/PlayerScript) Align player script function names #21020
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
CI is failing because of breaking changes related to the modules |
Can you please prepare PR(s) for the affected modules from the failed module ci. Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please see my last comment.
Who is the maintainer of the module? This will essentially break every module out there. |
The immediate relevant modules are those that fail in the modules build of this pr. Any staff member (with sufficient rights) can approve and merge PRs on modules under the azerothcore organization on GitHub. |
PR opened. |
This is a breaking change, as this is changing almost all Playerscript hooks to align the names between the header and cpp file and also introduces a convention after which these hooks are named. Essentially they are all called OnPlayer...
Changes Proposed:
This PR proposes changes to:
Issues Addressed:
SOURCE:
The changes have been validated through:
Tests Performed:
This PR has been:
How to Test the Changes:
Known Issues and TODO List:
How to Test AzerothCore PRs
When a PR is ready to be tested, it will be marked as [WAITING TO BE TESTED].
You can help by testing PRs and writing your feedback here on the PR's page on GitHub. Follow the instructions here:
http://www.azerothcore.org/wiki/How-to-test-a-PR
REMEMBER: when testing a PR that changes something generic (i.e. a part of code that handles more than one specific thing), the tester should not only check that the PR does its job (e.g. fixing spell XXX) but especially check that the PR does not cause any regression (i.e. introducing new bugs).
For example: if a PR fixes spell X by changing a part of code that handles spells X, Y, and Z, we should not only test X, but we should test Y and Z as well.