Add rebar 3.7.x compatibility #3
Conversation
nalundgaard
commented
Nov 26, 2018
nalundgaard
commented
- add compatibility with new resource format introduced in rebar 3.7.0 in backwards-compatible way.
* Move code handling rebar v2 resources to dedicated head and check it more reliably (`is_rec_type` check) * Restore old format check for "legacy" resources (when using rebar3 <3.7.0)
|
Don't merge this just yet, still testing it. |
nalundgaard
force-pushed
the
rebar_3.7_compat
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c65406b to
577cae6
Compare
nalundgaard
force-pushed
the
rebar_3.7_compat
branch
6 times, most recently
from
4695d66 to
fd7497b
Compare
nalundgaard
force-pushed
the
rebar_3.7_compat
branch
4 times, most recently
from
ee9ea74 to
f88335f
Compare
Implement rebar_resource_v2 compatible callbacks in order to make the plugin compatible with all known versions of rebar3, following the guide at https://www.rebar3.org/v3/docs/custom-dep-resources#section-resources-compatible-with-all-versions
nalundgaard
force-pushed
the
rebar_3.7_compat
branch
from
f88335f to
e7576aa
Compare
|
@nalundgaard maybe you guys at Alert Logic could take over this project? i'm not seeing this getting merged any time sooner... |
|
That is effectively what we’ve done, I suppose. I don’t know if anyone even has access to the basho organization now, maybe @mrallen1 would know? Anyway, I forked the repo to alertlogic/rebar_raw_resource and published it to hex. |
|
ah cool, i didn't see |
|
I've only seen merges on Riak stuff. @martinsumner do you know who at Bet365 could maybe merge this or add maintainers to this project? |
|
@martincox is the one for adding new maintainers. However, I don't think this is used anywhere within Riak, so it might be better to switch this out of the basho domain. |
|
Do alertlogic want to take over the repo? I can transfer to a new org if that is preferred? |
|
That is fine for me, we can take it over. @motobob any objections to that? |
|
@martincox are you still interested in transferring this to us? |
