Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove explicit mentions of codee tools from the descriptions of checks #65

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

alvrogd
Copy link
Collaborator

@alvrogd alvrogd commented Jan 9, 2025

The descriptions of checks should be independent of the tooling that helps detect them.

@alvrogd alvrogd requested review from daniel-otero and a team January 9, 2025 11:47
@alvrogd alvrogd self-assigned this Jan 9, 2025
@alvrogd alvrogd requested review from ruifm and removed request for a team January 9, 2025 11:47
@alvrogd alvrogd force-pushed the feature/RemoveCodeeReferencesInChecks branch from 44cdd84 to 6971c96 Compare January 9, 2025 11:48
@alvrogd alvrogd requested a review from d-alonso January 9, 2025 11:48
Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-otero daniel-otero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great!

Checks/RMK014/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@alvrogd alvrogd requested a review from daniel-otero January 9, 2025 16:22
Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-otero daniel-otero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

The descriptions of checks should be independent of the tooling that
helps detect them.
Which is from the Codee technology.
@alvrogd alvrogd force-pushed the feature/RemoveCodeeReferencesInChecks branch from 0f7d6cf to efa999f Compare January 15, 2025 15:55
@alvrogd alvrogd merged commit efa999f into main Jan 15, 2025
7 checks passed
@alvrogd alvrogd deleted the feature/RemoveCodeeReferencesInChecks branch January 15, 2025 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants