-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MNT: rerender #349
MNT: rerender #349
Changes from all commits
26bb241
cb5f89f
98fd6aa
63c540b
7c73959
5ba9b28
43ea176
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -21,9 +21,10 @@ build: | |
skip: True | ||
{% endif %} | ||
script: | ||
- cp {{ os.environ["FEEDSTOCK_ROOT"] }}/LICENSE.txt ${RECIPE_DIR}/LICENSE.txt # [linux] | ||
- cp ${RECIPE_DIR}/../LICENSE.txt ${RECIPE_DIR}/LICENSE.txt # [osx] | ||
- COPY "%RECIPE_DIR%\\..\\LICENSE.txt" "%RECIPE_DIR%\\LICENSE.txt" # [win] | ||
# Copy feedstock license file to recipe directory | ||
- pushd {{ RECIPE_DIR }} | ||
- cp recipe-scripts-license.txt LICENSE.txt | ||
- popd | ||
- if not exist "%LIBRARY_BIN%" mkdir "%LIBRARY_BIN%" # [win] | ||
- mkdir -p "${PREFIX}/bin" # [unix] | ||
- COPY "%RECIPE_DIR%\\run_conda_forge_build_setup_win.bat" "%SCRIPTS%\\run_conda_forge_build_setup.bat" # [win] | ||
|
@@ -57,8 +58,8 @@ requirements: | |
- {{ compiler('cuda') }} # [cuda_compiler_version != "None"] | ||
- {{ compiler('c') }} # [cuda_compiler_version != "None"] | ||
- {{ stdlib('c') }} # [cuda_compiler_version != "None"] | ||
- python # [build_platform != target_platform] | ||
- cross-python_{{ target_platform }} # [build_platform != target_platform] | ||
- python # [cuda_compiler_version != "None" and build_platform != target_platform] | ||
- cross-python_{{ target_platform }} # [cuda_compiler_version != "None" and build_platform != target_platform] | ||
Comment on lines
-60
to
+62
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This change is wrong. even when cuda compiler version is none we need the cross-python tools for cross-builds of the python package in this recipe. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. See the osx-arm64 build failures with this change for example. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yeah was just trying stuff. Agree this isn't working Should we consider moving this to There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We can but i'd like to understand why this is failing when it did not this morning. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Also, do you know why we need all of the cuda variants? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. |
||
host: | ||
- python | ||
- pip | ||
|
@@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ about: | |
home: https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-ci-setup-feedstock | ||
summary: A package installed by conda-forge each time a build is run on CI. This package has side-effects to your conda config. | ||
license: BSD-3-Clause | ||
license_file: LICENSE.txt | ||
license_file: {{ RECIPE_DIR }}/LICENSE.txt | ||
|
||
extra: | ||
recipe-maintainers: | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Doesn't this rely on an implementation detail in smithy? It is also very opaque since this file appears nowhere in the actual recipe.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Am ok going back to the previous approach. Was just trying this to see if we could simplify
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah we should go back and add a
.get