-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not for merge: 9.2 backports #1775
Conversation
* Pass hash through as explicit hash to avoid unknown keyword argument error. * Changelog entry for #1757
Created-by: polyglot-release v1.6.0
@@ -75,7 +75,9 @@ def row(row) | |||
def eof; end | |||
end | |||
|
|||
NULL_CONVERSIONS = Hash.new(strict: false, proc: ->(cell_value) { cell_value }).freeze | |||
# This is a Hash being initialized with a default value of a Hash, DO NOT REFORMAT TO REMOVE {} | |||
# Future versions [3.4.0+] of ruby will interpret these as keywords and break. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it possible to change from "future" to just "3.4"? Future is not accurate anymore
# Future versions [3.4.0+] of ruby will interpret these as keywords and break. | |
# Ruby versions from 3.4.0 onwards interpret these as keywords and break. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll fix this up in main
when we cut a v10. For now I'm focussing on getting the stuff out which is causing some issues.
@luke-hill is there anything I (or anybody) can do to help you get this landed? |
There's an issue currently with the api token. I'm not quite sure what though. I've spoken to the team internally and we need to investigate why this happened. If it will take a while I'm tempted to just regenerate the overall key and re-add it to each repo. But I don't actually know why it stopped working. See here |
Mmmm, yeah probably not something that anybody else can help with directly. Maybe the token expired? |
if a new API key is needed, is it possible to reconsider this? RubyGems should support skipping MFA for API keys, so it should be possible to opt-in for MFA |
I just went nuclear and purged everything and re-generated everything. Then pushing to 9.2.1 worked. In doing so I realised the way we were doing our API keys was a bit clunky, so I tidied it up for everything else. Will close this ticket off as completed. The next release will be a v10 one as I don't want to faff around with any more backports. If I can carry on with the v10 stuff it should be done soon |
TBC:
9.3
main
Description
Type of change
Please add an entry to the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md as part of this pull request.
Checklist:
Your PR is ready for review once the following checklist is
complete. You can also add some checks if you want to.
bundle exec rubocop
reports no offenses