Save issued certificates #53
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jschlyter has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces changes to the Nodeman project, primarily focusing on enhancing the node enrollment process. The modifications include updating the return type of enrollment functions from Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant EnrollmentService
participant CertificateManager
Client->>EnrollmentService: Initiate Enrollment
EnrollmentService->>CertificateManager: Generate Certificates
CertificateManager-->>EnrollmentService: Return Enrollment Result
EnrollmentService-->>Client: Provide NodeEnrollmentResult
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
nodeman/db_models.py (1)
74-81: Consider adding docstring to get_ext_hex method.The method implementation is solid with proper error handling and type hints. Consider adding a docstring to explain the purpose and parameters.
@staticmethod def get_ext_hex(x509_certificate: x509.Certificate, oid: ObjectIdentifier) -> str | None: + """ + Extract and hex-encode an X.509 certificate extension. + + Args: + x509_certificate: The certificate to extract from + oid: The extension OID to extract + + Returns: + Hex-encoded extension value or None if not found + """ try: ext = x509_certificate.extensions.get_extension_for_oid(oid) return hexlify(ext.value.public_bytes()).decode() except ExtensionNotFound: return None
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
nodeman/client.py(2 hunks)nodeman/db_models.py(3 hunks)nodeman/models.py(1 hunks)nodeman/settings.py(1 hunks)tests/test_api.py(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- tests/test_api.py
- nodeman/settings.py
- nodeman/models.py
🔇 Additional comments (4)
nodeman/db_models.py (2)
71-72: LGTM! Good addition of certificate key identifier fields.The new fields will help track the certificate chain relationships, which is essential for certificate management.
92-93: LGTM! Clean integration of new fields.The update to from_x509_certificate cleanly integrates the new fields using the get_ext_hex helper method.
nodeman/client.py (2)
56-56: Verify NodeEnrollmentResult model fields.The function now returns NodeEnrollmentResult instead of NodeConfiguration. Let's verify the model structure to ensure all required fields are handled.
✅ Verification successful
Model structure verification successful
NodeEnrollmentResult properly combines both configuration fields (name, MQTT details, JWKS) and certificate data (X.509 certificates, validity) through inheritance from NodeConfiguration and NodeCertificate. The model is well-structured and type-safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check NodeEnrollmentResult model definition rg -A 10 "class NodeEnrollmentResult"Length of output: 148
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check parent class definitions echo "=== NodeConfiguration ===" rg -A 10 "class NodeConfiguration" echo -e "\n=== NodeCertificate ===" rg -A 10 "class NodeCertificate"Length of output: 1567
56-56: Verify certificate handling in enrollment flow.The enrollment flow now saves both the node certificate and CA certificate. Let's verify the certificate handling:
- Are certificates properly validated before saving?
- Is error handling in place for missing certificates?
Also applies to: 208-211
✅ Verification successful
Certificate handling verification completed successfully.
The enrollment flow implements proper certificate validation and error handling:
- Certificates are validated before saving (PEM format, chain validation)
- Comprehensive error handling for invalid certificates
- CSR validation includes signature verification and subject checks
- Security measures include fingerprint verification
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check certificate validation and error handling # Look for certificate validation rg -A 5 "x509_certificate|x509_ca_certificate" # Look for related error handling rg -A 5 "raise|except.*certificate"Length of output: 28348
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Refactor
Documentation