Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: bump kube-stack Helm chart onboarding version #208217

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rogercoll
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Bumps the pinned version of the Kube-stack Helm Chart version used in the K8s Otel Onboarding flow.

Release: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-helm-charts/releases/tag/opentelemetry-kube-stack-0.3.9

Checklist

Check the PR satisfies following conditions.

Reviewers should verify this PR satisfies this list as well.

  • Any text added follows EUI's writing guidelines, uses sentence case text and includes i18n support
  • Documentation was added for features that require explanation or tutorials
  • Unit or functional tests were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
  • If a plugin configuration key changed, check if it needs to be allowlisted in the cloud and added to the docker list
  • This was checked for breaking HTTP API changes, and any breaking changes have been approved by the breaking-change committee. The release_note:breaking label should be applied in these situations.
  • Flaky Test Runner was used on any tests changed
  • The PR description includes the appropriate Release Notes section, and the correct release_note:* label is applied per the guidelines

Identify risks

Does this PR introduce any risks? For example, consider risks like hard to test bugs, performance regression, potential of data loss.

Describe the risk, its severity, and mitigation for each identified risk. Invite stakeholders and evaluate how to proceed before merging.

@rogercoll rogercoll requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2025 15:16
@rogercoll
Copy link
Contributor Author

The new pinned version is compatible with the current provided configuration (values file).

@rogercoll rogercoll requested a review from gbamparop January 24, 2025 15:30
@gbamparop
Copy link
Contributor

@rogercoll does this target 8.18?

@rogercoll
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rogercoll does this target 8.18?

Correct, that should go with the new version of the values file elastic/elastic-agent#6444

@gbamparop gbamparop added backport:version Backport to applied version labels v9.0.0 v8.18.0 labels Jan 24, 2025
@gbamparop
Copy link
Contributor

@rogercoll does this target 8.18?

Correct, that should go with the new version of the values file elastic/elastic-agent#6444

Added the labels to target 8.18 and 9.0. Would it be good to test the flow in this PR after elastic/elastic-agent#6444 has been merged, WDYT?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants