Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correctly handle calls setting timestamp to 0 #23310

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

hoodmane
Copy link
Collaborator

@hoodmane hoodmane commented Jan 6, 2025

If someone calls utimes("file", 0, 0) the previous code I wrote would not adjust the time stamp.

If someone calls `utimes("file", 0, 0)` the previous code I wrote would
not adjust the time stamp.
@sbc100
Copy link
Collaborator

sbc100 commented Jan 6, 2025

Test?

@hoodmane
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hoodmane commented Jan 6, 2025

I added it to test_futimens but of course running that on nodefs detected more problems to fix.

This is an automatic change generated by tools/maint/rebaseline_tests.py.

The following (18) test expectation files were updated by
running the tests with `--rebaseline`:

```
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_ctors1.gzsize: 8365 => 8374 [+9 bytes / +0.11%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_ctors1.jssize: 20373 => 20391 [+18 bytes / +0.09%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_ctors2.gzsize: 8347 => 8358 [+11 bytes / +0.13%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_ctors2.jssize: 20341 => 20359 [+18 bytes / +0.09%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_except.gzsize: 9369 => 9377 [+8 bytes / +0.09%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_except.jssize: 24141 => 24159 [+18 bytes / +0.07%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_except_wasm.gzsize: 8328 => 8340 [+12 bytes / +0.14%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_except_wasm.jssize: 20267 => 20285 [+18 bytes / +0.09%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_except_wasm_exnref.gzsize: 8328 => 8340 [+12 bytes / +0.14%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_except_wasm_exnref.jssize: 20267 => 20285 [+18 bytes / +0.09%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_lto.gzsize: 8360 => 8371 [+11 bytes / +0.13%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_lto.jssize: 20397 => 20415 [+18 bytes / +0.09%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_mangle.gzsize: 9374 => 9384 [+10 bytes / +0.11%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_mangle.jssize: 24142 => 24160 [+18 bytes / +0.07%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_noexcept.gzsize: 8365 => 8374 [+9 bytes / +0.11%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_cxx_noexcept.jssize: 20373 => 20391 [+18 bytes / +0.09%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_files_js_fs.gzsize: 7655 => 7665 [+10 bytes / +0.13%]
other/codesize/test_codesize_files_js_fs.jssize: 18867 => 18885 [+18 bytes / +0.10%]

Average change: +0.10% (+0.07% - +0.14%)
```
src/library_nodefs.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/library_workerfs.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants