-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 995
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add internal resolution for assets in get_url
function
#2726
Open
ZzMzaw
wants to merge
11
commits into
getzola:next
Choose a base branch
from
ZzMzaw:feat/resolve-internal-assets
base: next
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9278bd1
Compute colocated path for sections
ZzMzaw 8ff616d
Harmonize serialize assets for pages and sections
ZzMzaw faed94a
Add assets permalinks for pages and sections
ZzMzaw 106c547
Add assets permalinks per language to site
ZzMzaw 9620795
Add assets permalinks to `get_url`
ZzMzaw f74f551
Fix documentation about galery
ZzMzaw 49f66b2
Fix hashmap init for assets permalink test
ZzMzaw 334f687
Check page and section entire colocated path
ZzMzaw 23051b8
Rework serialize_assets and get_assets_permalinks
ZzMzaw d213e39
Use iterator for get_asset_permalinks
ZzMzaw 2f69aa5
Regroup assets serialization and permalinks calls
ZzMzaw File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you assert what the actual path it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just asserted what is really important for a colocated path which is not starting with a '/' and ending with a '/'.
I wanted to emphasize that because if you change the way you compute colocated path in the future but don't respect those two assertions, you'll break the current feature.
I definitely can split the check (one for the page and one for the section as they have different colocated path) in this test while adding a comment on what is really important to keep through time.
Would it be ok for you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes that would be fine