Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(ssa): fix incorrectly ABI for uninstantiated generic methods #962

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cpunion
Copy link
Contributor

@cpunion cpunion commented Jan 17, 2025

Fix #947

  • Skip ABI generation for uninstantiated generic methods

Maybe a better way is refactoring ABI generation based on type/func compilation.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.61%. Comparing base (e016e92) to head (918b36e).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #962      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.58%   81.61%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          53       53              
  Lines        9050     9067      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         7383     7400      +17     
  Misses       1516     1516              
  Partials      151      151              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@cpunion cpunion force-pushed the fix-abi branch 2 times, most recently from d9b0930 to 4523fb2 Compare January 17, 2025 12:22
@cpunion cpunion changed the title fix(ssa): fix incorrectly generated ABI for uninstantiated generic methods fix(ssa): fix incorrectly ABI for uninstantiated generic methods Jan 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Generic type methods were not fully generated
1 participant