Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_windows_web_app_slot - fix doc discrepancy #25227

Merged
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ func SiteConfigSchemaWindowsFunctionAppSlot() *pluginsdk.Schema {
Type: pluginsdk.TypeBool,
Optional: true,
Default: true,
Description: "Should the Windows Web App use a 32-bit worker.",
Description: "Should the Windows Function App use a 32-bit worker.",
},

"websockets_enabled": {
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion website/docs/r/windows_web_app_slot.html.markdown
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ A `site_config` block supports the following:

* `scm_use_main_ip_restriction` - (Optional) Should the Windows Web App Slot `ip_restriction` configuration be used for the SCM also.

* `use_32_bit_worker` - (Optional) Should the Windows Web App Slotuse a 32-bit worker. Defaults to `true`.
* `use_32_bit_worker` - (Optional) Should the Windows Web App Slot use a 32-bit worker. The default value varies from different service plans.

* `virtual_application` - (Optional) One or more `virtual_application` blocks as defined below.

Expand Down
Loading