Update LLM provider SDK npm packages

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@anthropic-ai/bedrock-sdk	dependencies	minor	0.10.0 -> 0.11.2
@anthropic-ai/sdk	dependencies	minor	0.24.0 -> 0.32.1

---

Release Notes

anthropics/anthropic-sdk-typescript (@​anthropic-ai/bedrock-sdk)

v0.11.0

Full Changelog: v0.10.2...v0.11.0

Features

• api: add messages endpoint with streaming helpers (#​235) (12b914f)
• client: support reading the base url from an env variable (#​223) (5bc3600)

Chores

• ci: run release workflow once per day (#​232) (115479f)
• deps: update dependency ts-jest to v29.1.1 (#​233) (bec6ab1)
• deps: update jest (#​234) (5506174)
• update dependencies (#​231) (4e34536)
• update prettier (#​230) (173603e)

Documentation

• update examples to show claude-2.1 (#​227) (4b00d84)

Build System

• specify packageManager: yarn (#​229) (d31dae4)

v0.10.2

Compare Source

Full Changelog: v0.10.1...v0.10.2

v0.10.1

Compare Source

Full Changelog: v0.10.0...v0.10.1

Chores

• internal: remove file import and conditionally run prepare (#​217) (8ac5c7a)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "after 1am" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 22.89%. Comparing base (c6d0d1c) to head (b9a7b2e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../activities/shared/get-llm-response/llm-message.ts	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5038      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   22.86%   22.89%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         573      569       -4     
  Lines       19445    19195     -250     
  Branches     2754     2724      -30     
==========================================
- Hits         4447     4394      -53     
+ Misses      14945    14748     -197     
  Partials       53       53              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-30.079 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.575 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-22.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$69.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$60.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$46.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.961 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$52.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.783 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.706 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$98.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 415 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$81.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 396 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.580 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$89.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.174 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$94.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 500 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.132 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.065 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.40 \mathrm{s} \pm 541 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.200 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.204 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$84.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 378 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.718 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.91 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.81 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.792 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.72 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.80 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.351 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.359 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.58 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.507 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}21.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph