Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update npm package llamaindex to v0.8.29 #5154

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Sep 15, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Pending
llamaindex (source) dependencies minor 0.2.10 -> 0.8.29 0.8.30

Release Notes

run-llama/LlamaIndexTS (llamaindex)

v0.8.29

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • dd596a0: Add Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental

v0.8.28

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.27

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.26

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.25

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.24

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • 515f2c1: Add vector store for CosmosDB

v0.8.23

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.22

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.21

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • 83c3897: fix: pinecone vector store search
  • efa2211: feat: add Azure Cosmos DB mongo vCore DocumentStore, IndexStore, KVStore

v0.8.20

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • 02b22da: fix: supports Vercel bundling

v0.8.19

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.18

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.17

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.16

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.15

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • 3d503cb: Update azure cosmos db
  • 5dae534: fix: propagate queryStr to concrete vectorStore

v0.8.14

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • 630b425: feat: add Azure CosmosDB NoSql Chat store

v0.8.13

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.12

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.11

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.10

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.9

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.8

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.7

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.6

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.5

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.4

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.3

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.2

Compare Source

Patch Changes
  • dd596a0: Add Gemini 2.0 Flash Experimental

v0.8.1

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.8.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • 98ba1e7: fea:t implement context-aware agent
Patch Changes

v0.7.10

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.7.9

Compare Source

Patch Changes

v0.7.8

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge September 15, 2024 00:35
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 15, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps labels Sep 15, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/llamaindex-0.x branch from 4d02ddc to bf347d7 Compare September 15, 2024 19:16
@hash-worker hash-worker bot changed the title Update npm package llamaindex to v0.5.25 Update npm package llamaindex to v0.5.26 Sep 15, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 15, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 15, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/llamaindex-0.x branch from ef2d2b9 to e9add9e Compare September 16, 2024 09:43
@hash-worker hash-worker bot changed the title Update npm package llamaindex to v0.5.27 Update npm package llamaindex to v0.6.0 Sep 16, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Sep 16, 2024
@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@indietyp indietyp force-pushed the deps/js/llamaindex-0.x branch from 5843619 to 689a6b3 Compare December 18, 2024 16:54
@indietyp indietyp requested a review from CiaranMn December 18, 2024 16:54
@indietyp indietyp marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 16:56
@vilkinsons
Copy link
Member

@indietyp Do we want to address these Semgrep flags here, or were they pre-existing in the codebase already?

@indietyp
Copy link
Member

these are from a previous iteration that I missed, will fix them!

Co-authored-by: Ciaran Morinan <37743469+CiaranMn@users.noreply.github.com>
@indietyp indietyp requested a review from CiaranMn December 18, 2024 17:59
@indietyp indietyp added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.985 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.548 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$68.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.362 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 248 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.927 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$59.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.154 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$50.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.907 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$55.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.729 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 478 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.296 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$95.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 562 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$80.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 443 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$87.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$93.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 451 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.767 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.51 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.63 \mathrm{s} \pm 283 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}5.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.994 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.204 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$57.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$84.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-51.853 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.24 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.89 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.38 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 54.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}32.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.12 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.09 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Merged via the queue into main with commit 8de9549 Dec 18, 2024
166 checks passed
@indietyp indietyp deleted the deps/js/llamaindex-0.x branch December 18, 2024 18:22
CiaranMn added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
Co-authored-by: hash-worker[bot] <180894564+hash-worker[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Bilal Mahmoud <bmahmoud@mpi-cbg.de>
Co-authored-by: Ciaran Morinan <37743469+CiaranMn@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants