Update Rust crate jsonschema to v0.20.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
jsonschema	workspace.dependencies	minor	=0.19.1 -> =0.20.0

---

Release Notes

Stranger6667/jsonschema-rs (jsonschema)

v0.20.0

Important: This release includes several deprecations and renames. While backward compatibility is maintained for now, users are encouraged to update their code. See the Migration Guide for details on transitioning to the new API.

Added

• New draft-specific modules for easier version-targeted validation:
  • jsonschema::draft4
  • jsonschema::draft6
  • jsonschema::draft7
  • jsonschema::draft201909
  • jsonschema::draft202012
    Each module provides new(), is_valid(), and options() functions.
• jsonschema::options() function as a shortcut for jsonschema::Validator::options(), that allows for customization of the validation process.

Changed

• Make Debug implementation for SchemaNode opaque.
• Make jsonschema::validator_for and related functions return ValidationError<'static> in their Err variant.
  This change makes possible to use the ? operator to return errors from functions where the input schema is defined.

Deprecated

• Rename CompilationOptions to ValidationOptions for clarity.
• Rename JSONSchema to Validator for clarity. #​424
• Rename JSONPointer to JsonPointer for consistency with naming conventions. #​424
• Rename jsonschema::compile to jsonschema::validator_for.
• Rename CompilationOptions::compile to ValidationOptions::build.

Old names are retained for backward compatibility but will be removed in a future release.

Fixed

• Location-independent references in remote schemas on drafts 4, 6, and 7.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 19.17%. Comparing base (b0f897e) to head (c48d3f6).
Report is 51 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5177      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   18.12%   19.17%   +1.04%     
==========================================
  Files         506      510       +4     
  Lines       16776    17005     +229     
  Branches     2546     2546              
==========================================
+ Hits         3041     3261     +220     
- Misses      13723    13732       +9     
  Partials       12       12              

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust.sarif	87.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.64 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.636 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.72 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.000 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-21.780 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$12.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.10 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.551 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.70 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.227 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.849 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.45 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.665 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.39 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.452 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}17.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.088 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.471 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.900 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.11 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.736 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$48.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.69 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$271 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.33 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-82.200 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.008 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$72.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 96.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.672 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$98.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 460 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.608 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 345 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.407 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 377 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.058 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.831 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$79.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.488 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$89.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 360 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.635 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.305 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 231 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.522 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph