Update temporalio-ts monorepo to v1.11.2

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@temporalio/activity (source)	dependencies	minor	1.10.1 -> 1.11.2
@temporalio/client (source)	dependencies	minor	1.10.1 -> 1.11.2
@temporalio/common (source)	dependencies	minor	1.10.1 -> 1.11.2
@temporalio/proto (source)	dependencies	minor	1.10.1 -> 1.11.2
@temporalio/worker (source)	dependencies	minor	1.10.1 -> 1.11.2
@temporalio/workflow (source)	devDependencies	minor	1.10.1 -> 1.11.2
@temporalio/workflow (source)	dependencies	minor	1.10.1 -> 1.11.2

---

Release Notes

temporalio/sdk-typescript (@​temporalio/activity)

v1.11.2: 1.11.2

Compare Source

Important ⚠️ ⚠️ ⚠️

• This release fixes a bug in 1.11.0 and 1.11.1 that may result in Workflows failing to replay with the very same code.
  We urge users who are already using v1.11.0 or v1.11.1 to promptly upgrade to this release.

Bug Fixes

• [workflow] Workflow Activation Encoder was discarding SDK flags (#​1530)
• [core] Respect gRPC timeouts on get wf execution history (temporalio/sdk-core#812)
• [core] Attempt to address unusal rpc cancellation error (temporalio/sdk-core#811)
• [core] Fix legacy query failure replying (temporalio/sdk-core#809)
• [core] Fix possible NDEs caused by LAs & immediate cancels resolving in different order upon replay (temporalio/sdk-core#808)
• [workflow] Fix potential incoherencies in Workflow Activation Jobs ordering (#​1513, temporalio/sdk-core#789)
• [core] Include Search Attribute updates made in-workflow when continuing as new (temporalio/sdk-core#797)
• [core] Add basic validation on Activity Tasks (temporalio/sdk-core#795)
• [core] Do not send queries after we would fail WFT (temporalio/sdk-core#792)

Dependencies

• Upgrade multiple vulnerable deps (#​1518, #​1521)

Thanks

• Thanks to Ilya Priven for multiple docs improvements (#​1507, #​1525, #​1527, #​1524).

v1.11.1: 1.11.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• [client] Reexport WorkflowExecutionAlreadyStartedError from @temporalio/client (#​1498)

v1.11.0: 1.11.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• Fix flakes in Worker Tuner and Workflow Update tests (#​1463)
• [workflow] Don't propagate cancellation from non-cancellable scopes to children (#​1429)
• [worker] Don't fail Worker on Activity Task decode failures (port from #​1473) (#​1477)
• [ci] Enable file-based persistence on dev server for stress tests (#​1480)
• [workflow] Fix cancel-before-started abandon activity (#​1487)
• [doc] Docs were no longer being built and deployed in CI (#​1494)
• [workflow] Process all activation jobs as a single batch (#​1488)

Documentation

• Clarify some drawbacks of ephemeral servers, and other minor fixes (#​1478)

Features

Resource-based Worker Auto-tuning (EXPERIMENTAL)

Experimental support for worker tuning has been added along with an implementation for auto-tuning based on available
resources. WorkerOptions now has a tuner field that can be set to a WorkerTuner. This is composed of SlotSuppliers, of which currently FixedSize and ResourceBased are available. ResourceBased tuners change the number of available slots dynamically based on resource usage. For some examples of initializing the worker tuner, see here.

At some point the SlotSupplier interface will be manually implementable, but only fixed-size and resource-based slot suppliers are currently supported. Custom slot suppliers will appear in the future.

This SDK API is experimental and may change in incompatible ways in the future.

• [workflow] Unify GRPC::CANCELED and DEADLINE_EXCEEDED in an SDK Timeout exception for Update (#​1452)
• [workflow] Expose updateId to update handlers (#​1450)
• [workflow] Add upsert memo command (#​1321)

Miscellaneous Tasks

• Bump GHA runner for stress tests (#​1492)

Client

• Make gRPC INTERNAL status retryable (#​1455)

v1.10.3: 1.10.3

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• [worker] Don't fail Worker on Activity Task decode failures (#​1473)

v1.10.2

Compare Source

Bug Fixes

• [worker] Fix clients being created without prefixed metric meter (#​1465)
• [workflow] Don't propagate cancellation from non-cancellable scopes to children (#​1466)
• Update dependencies (#​1467)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 564 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$47.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$71.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 705 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-9.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$61.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 310 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.473 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$99.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 826 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.72 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$95.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 626 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$84.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 713 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.13 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.47 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.12 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$18.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$18.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 249 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-13.780 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 230 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-33.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.654 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.940 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.08 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$51.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}22.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$73.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 518 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.146 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$272 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.23 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.89 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 154 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.41 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph