Update Rust crate pin-project to v1.1.7

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
pin-project	workspace.dependencies	patch	=1.1.6 -> =1.1.7

---

Release Notes

taiki-e/pin-project (pin-project)

v1.1.7

Compare Source

• Work around an issue on negative_impls that allows unsound overlapping Unpin implementations. (#​357)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.21%. Comparing base (4efd3b8) to head (0c1e437).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5497   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   20.21%   20.21%           
=======================================
  Files         508      508           
  Lines       17252    17252           
  Branches     2533     2533           
=======================================
  Hits         3488     3488           
  Misses      13726    13726           
  Partials       38       38           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.20% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	48.46% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.06% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.32% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	5.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	73.06% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.31 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.293 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.44 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}25.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.23 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-17.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.90 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.824 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 51.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}50.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.35 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 341 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.141 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$49.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.921 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.169 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.320 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 566 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$92.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 365 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 240 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.709 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$87.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.062 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$80.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 708 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$96.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 488 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.205 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-24.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$275 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.89 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.949 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.082 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 147 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.657 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$74.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.303 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 157 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.556 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.770 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$17.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 185 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.358 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph