Update npm package wasm-pack to v0.13.1

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
wasm-pack	devDependencies	patch	0.13.0 -> 0.13.1

---

Release Notes

rustwasm/wasm-pack (wasm-pack)

v0.13.1

Compare Source

• ✨ Features

  • Requests using proxy settings from env - jjyr, pull/1438

    This enables ureq to use proxy settings from env, it solves lots of pain in network restricted environments.

• 🤕 Fixes

  • Update binary-install to v0.4.1 - drager, pull/1407

    Release v0.4.0 of binary-install introduced a regression that caused failures on some platforms. This release fixes that regression.

  • ** Allow npm binary upgrades - net, pull/1439**

    Fixes an issue where upgrading wasm-pack via NPM would not update the underlying binary.
    Previously, the binary was stored in the binary-install package's directory without versioning, causing version upgrades to silently fail as the old binary continued to be used.
    The binary is now stored in node_modules/wasm-pack/binary/, ensuring proper version updates when upgrading the package.

    Before: Upgrading from 0.12.1 to 0.13.0 would continue using the 0.12.1 binary
    After: Each wasm-pack version manages its own binary, enabling proper version upgrades

• 🛠️ Maintenance

  • ** Remove unmaintained dependency atty in favor of stdlib - mariusvniekerk, pull/1436**

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.13%. Comparing base (dd2bffb) to head (1660e8e).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5536      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.13%   20.13%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         509      509              
  Lines       17316    17321       +5     
  Branches     2537     2538       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         3487     3488       +1     
- Misses      13791    13795       +4     
  Partials       38       38              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.38% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.19% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	47.40% <ø> (-1.06%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.05% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.58 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.070 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.560 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.43 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.566 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.67 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.682 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.586 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.363 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.012 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$57.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 448 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.475 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$92.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$89.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.926 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$79.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.563 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$98.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.747 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$50.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.830 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$551 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.82 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}105 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 224 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.467 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$74.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.170 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.883 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.974 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.052 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 175 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.057 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.870 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.234 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.374 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.84 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph