Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update npm package @types/google.picker to v0.0.47 #5538

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Nov 2, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
@types/google.picker (source) devDependencies patch 0.0.43 -> 0.0.47

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge November 2, 2024 07:38
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team area/apps labels Nov 2, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Nov 2, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/google.picker-0.x branch from 664b448 to bddfc45 Compare November 11, 2024 18:12
@hash-worker hash-worker bot changed the title Update npm package @types/google.picker to v0.0.44 Update npm package @types/google.picker to v0.0.45 Nov 11, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Nov 11, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/google.picker-0.x branch from bddfc45 to 8ca714d Compare November 18, 2024 16:46
@hash-worker hash-worker bot changed the title Update npm package @types/google.picker to v0.0.45 Update npm package @types/google.picker to v0.0.46 Nov 18, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Nov 18, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Nov 28, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Nov 29, 2024
@hash-worker hash-worker bot force-pushed the deps/js/google.picker-0.x branch from d0a114d to b3f60ce Compare December 14, 2024 00:53
@hash-worker hash-worker bot changed the title Update npm package @types/google.picker to v0.0.46 Update npm package @types/google.picker to v0.0.47 Dec 14, 2024
hashdotai
hashdotai previously approved these changes Dec 14, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.86%. Comparing base (a0e38fe) to head (b3f60ce).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5538      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.90%   22.86%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         572      573       +1     
  Lines       19394    19445      +51     
  Branches     2746     2754       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         4442     4447       +5     
- Misses      14899    14945      +46     
  Partials       53       53              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client 58.22% <ø> (-1.47%) ⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils 8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 0.98% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph 24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer 6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif 88.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@hash-worker
Copy link
Contributor Author

hash-worker bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 215 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.80 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 192 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 156 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.740 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.797 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.835 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$68.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.066 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$59.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$50.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 760 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$95.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 281 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$79.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$89.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 338 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$92.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.33 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.009 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.62 \mathrm{s} \pm 282 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$27.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.61 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$56.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$83.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 546 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-52.142 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.266 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.46 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.14 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$13.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}34.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.47 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.196 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.96 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.681 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.75 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.529 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$2.70 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-17.866 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Merged via the queue into main with commit 63d4ac4 Dec 16, 2024
164 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/js/google.picker-0.x branch December 16, 2024 14:22
CiaranMn added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2025
Co-authored-by: hash-worker[bot] <180894564+hash-worker[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Ciaran Morinan <c@hash.ai>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants