Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update npm package webpack to v5.96.1 #5540

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Nov 2, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
webpack devDependencies minor 5.95.0 -> 5.96.1

Release Notes

webpack/webpack (webpack)

v5.96.1

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • [Types] Add @types/eslint-scope to dependencieS
  • [Types] Fixed regression in validate

v5.96.0

Compare Source

Bug Fixes
  • Fixed Module Federation should track all referenced chunks
  • Handle Data URI without base64 word
  • HotUpdateChunk have correct runtime when modified with new runtime
  • Order of chunks ids in generated chunk code
  • No extra Javascript chunks when using asset module as an entrypoint
  • Use optimistically logic for output.environment.dynamicImport to determine chunk format when no browserslist or target
  • Collision with global variables for optimization.avoidEntryIife
  • Avoid through variables in inlined module
  • Allow chunk template strings in output.devtoolNamespace
  • No extra runtime for get javascript/css chunk filename
  • No extra runtime for prefetch and preload in JS runtime when it was unsed in CSS
  • Avoid cache invalidation using ProgressPlugin
  • Increase parallelism when using importModule on the execution stage
  • Correctly parsing string in export and import
  • Typescript types
  • [CSS] css/auto considers a module depending on its filename as css (pure CSS) or css/local, before it was css/global and css/local
  • [CSS] Always interpolate classes even if they are not involved in export
  • [CSS] No extra runtime in Javascript runtime chunks for asset modules used in CSS
  • [CSS] No extra runtime in Javascript runtime chunks for external asset modules used in CSS
  • [CSS] No extra runtime for the node target
  • [CSS] Fixed url()s and @import parsing
  • [CSS] Fixed - emit a warning on broken :local and :global
New Features
  • Export CSS and ESM runtime modules
  • Single Runtime Chunk and Federation eager module hoisting
  • [CSS] Support /* webpackIgnore: true */ for CSS files
  • [CSS] Support src() support
  • [CSS] CSS nesting in CSS modules

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge November 2, 2024 09:16
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team area/apps labels Nov 2, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.13%. Comparing base (321c879) to head (f027797).
Report is 105 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5540      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.13%   20.13%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         509      509              
  Lines       17316    17321       +5     
  Branches     2537     2538       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         3487     3488       +1     
- Misses      13791    13795       +4     
  Partials       38       38              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.38% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 1.19% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 47.40% <ø> (-1.06%) ⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils 8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 1.05% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph 24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 2, 2024

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$1.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.13 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$5.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}26.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.922 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.03 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.114 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.775 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.95 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.218 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.548 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.31 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$66.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 429 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$52.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$39.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 244 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.863 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$48.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.907 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$42.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.612 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$56.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.956 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 450 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.567 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$92.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 556 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.608 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$40.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.773 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$87.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 560 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.673 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$78.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 344 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.529 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$97.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 518 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.552 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 10 entities $$50.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.413 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$559 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.70 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$19.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.669 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 25 entities $$72.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.177 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.512 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.824 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.399 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.243 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

@hash-worker hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 84f93d6 Nov 2, 2024
164 of 165 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/js/webpack-5.x branch November 2, 2024 10:37
JesusFileto pushed a commit to JesusFileto/Chonky that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
Co-authored-by: hash-worker[bot] <180894564+hash-worker[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/apps > hash* Affects HASH (a `hash-*` app) area/apps area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant