Update Vitest npm packages to v2.1.4

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@vitest/coverage-istanbul (source)	devDependencies	patch	2.1.3 -> 2.1.4
vitest (source)	devDependencies	patch	2.1.3 -> 2.1.4

---

Release Notes

vitest-dev/vitest (@​vitest/coverage-istanbul)

v2.1.4

Compare Source

   🚀 Features

This patch release includes a non-breaking feature for the experimental Browser Mode that doesn't follow SemVer. If you want to avoid picking up releases like this, make sure to pin the Vitest version in your package.json. See npm's documentation about semver for more information.

• browser: Allow custom HTML path, respect plugins transformIndexHtml  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6725 (16902)

   🐞 Bug Fixes

• windows:
  • Don't normalize drive case letter in root  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6792 (b28cd)
• browser:
  • Fix default browser port  -  by @​hi-ogawa in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6700 (9c518)
  • Optimize expect-type  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6713 (07918)
  • Don't polyfill process.env  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6718 (da6d2)
  • Increment browser port automatically if there are several projects with browser.enabled  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6717 (a9397)
  • Cleanup keyboard state  -  by @​hi-ogawa in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6731 (19278)
  • Don't add v= queries to setup files imports  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6759 (b8258)
  • User event cleanup on retry  -  by @​hi-ogawa in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6764 (bdd15)
  • Ignore non mocked msw requests  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6770 (9d9ba)
  • Initiate MSW in the same frame as tests  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6772 (2444f)
• deps:
  • Update dependency sirv to v3  -  in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6701 (fde5d)
• expect:
  • Correct behavior of toThrowError with empty string parameter  -  by @​shulaoda in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6710 (a6129)
• mocker:
  • Remove spy from peer dependencies  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6777 (3a8b5)
• vitest:
  • Clarify slowTestThreshold, print slow tests in non-TTY mode  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6715 (2e6aa)
  • Print warnings form Vite plugins  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6724 (121b1)
  • Don't fail if the working directory starts with a lowercase drive letter  -  by @​sheremet-va in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6779 (df6d7)
  • Silence import analysis warning  -  by @​hi-ogawa in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6785 (39041)
• vitest,runner:
  • Simplify test.extend type exports  -  by @​hi-ogawa in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6707 (e5c38)

   🏎 Performance

• Use hash to replace createHash  -  by @​btea in https://github.com/vitest-dev/vitest/issues/6703 (5d07b)

    View changes on GitHub

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 19.50%. Comparing base (d8efccc) to head (c03b03c).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5544      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.18%   19.50%   -0.68%     
==========================================
  Files         509      509              
  Lines       17282    17617     +335     
  Branches     2535     2608      +73     
==========================================
- Hits         3488     3437      -51     
- Misses      13756    14142     +386     
  Partials       38       38              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.38% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
apps.hash-api	1.19% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
blockprotocol.type-system	47.40% <ø> (-1.06%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.80% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.05% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (+0.22%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.86 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.600 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.53 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.274 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.709 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.918 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.17 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 33.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.46 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.008 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.94 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.092 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.257 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$69.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 331 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.135 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.490 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.444 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 357 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 180 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$60.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 386 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 608 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.945 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$95.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 419 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$91.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 545 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.730 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$82.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 774 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.7 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$554 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.84 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 95.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$24.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 163 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$74.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.707 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 254 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 210 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.247 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.823 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$18.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.704 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 213 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.167 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph