Update GitHub Action taiki-e/install-action to v2.44.61

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
taiki-e/install-action	action	patch	v2.44.60 -> v2.44.61

---

Release Notes

taiki-e/install-action (taiki-e/install-action)

v2.44.61: 2.44.61

Compare Source

• Update syft@latest to 1.16.0.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 2am on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.08%. Comparing base (41f4fd2) to head (d1d9e23).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5587      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.15%   20.08%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         509      514       +5     
  Lines       17319    17372      +53     
  Branches     2538     2545       +7     
==========================================
  Hits         3490     3490              
- Misses      13791    13844      +53     
  Partials       38       38              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.38% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.17% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
blockprotocol.type-system	47.40% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.05% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	5.88% <ø> (-0.79%)	⬇️
rust.error-stack	73.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.05 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.01 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}23.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.864 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.39 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.116 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.387 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.07 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.710 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.92 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.311 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.841 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.97 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.685 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$70.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 337 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.370 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.503 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$52.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.144 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$45.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.091 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$59.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 438 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 695 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.929 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$96.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 496 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$43.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$90.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 552 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.538 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$82.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.228 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 581 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.36 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$45.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.89 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$277 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.00 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-51.912 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$25.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$76.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 532 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.580 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 214 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.343 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.838 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.350 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.312 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.775 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 173 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.910 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph