Update Rust crate thiserror to v1.0.68

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
thiserror	workspace.dependencies	patch	=1.0.67 -> =1.0.68

---

Release Notes

dtolnay/thiserror (thiserror)

v1.0.68

Compare Source

• Handle incomplete expressions more robustly in format arguments, such as while code is being typed (#​341, #​344)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 20.08%. Comparing base (e309f52) to head (46e5e53).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5591      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   20.15%   20.08%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         509      514       +5     
  Lines       17319    17372      +53     
  Branches     2538     2545       +7     
==========================================
  Hits         3490     3490              
- Misses      13791    13844      +53     
  Partials       38       38              

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.38% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.17% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
blockprotocol.type-system	47.40% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.05% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	5.88% <ø> (-0.79%)	⬇️
rust.error-stack	73.03% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$76.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 580 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 207 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$19.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 145 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.593 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.66 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$269 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.88 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-50.469 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.69 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.774 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.86 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-17.477 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.208 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.098 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.901 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.671 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.52 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.791 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.85 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.91 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.630 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}6.18 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$92.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 557 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 562 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 261 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 435 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$84.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 675 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$70.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 393 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$60.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 426 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$42.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 217 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$46.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.99 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.073 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[vilkinsons]

@TimDiekmann Do we want to upgrade to this prior to switching to #5592 or can this PR be closed?