Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update GitHub Action github/codeql-action to v3.27.3 #5636

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

hash-worker[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@hash-worker hash-worker bot commented Nov 12, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
github/codeql-action action patch v3.27.2 -> v3.27.3

Release Notes

github/codeql-action (github/codeql-action)

v3.27.3

Compare Source

CodeQL Action Changelog

See the releases page for the relevant changes to the CodeQL CLI and language packs.

Note that the only difference between v2 and v3 of the CodeQL Action is the node version they support, with v3 running on node 20 while we continue to release v2 to support running on node 16. For example 3.22.11 was the first v3 release and is functionally identical to 2.22.11. This approach ensures an easy way to track exactly which features are included in different versions, indicated by the minor and patch version numbers.

3.27.3 - 12 Nov 2024

No user facing changes.

See the full CHANGELOG.md for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 2am on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@hash-worker hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge November 12, 2024 21:08
@github-actions github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Nov 12, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 19.84%. Comparing base (69aac3b) to head (e807b3a).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5636      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   19.84%   19.84%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         515      515              
  Lines       17321    17323       +2     
  Branches     2546     2547       +1     
==========================================
  Hits         3437     3437              
- Misses      13846    13848       +2     
  Partials       38       38              
Flag Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts 1.38% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api 1.17% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system 47.40% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils 8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk 100.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils 1.05% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
local.hash-subgraph 24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer 6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack 72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif 87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 25 entities $$71.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 472 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$25.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$20.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.924 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$48.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.88 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.85 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$540 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.57 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.440 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.059 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.104 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 186 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.646 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 211 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 25 entities $$3.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 5 entities $$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.50 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.267 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.25 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.562 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.21 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 50 entities $$4.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$1.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.79 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.498 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.625 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$2.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$2.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.58 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.76 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.166 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$88.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.273 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$98.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 496 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.45 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$93.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 587 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$80.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 411 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255 $$68.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2 $$49.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.468 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$58.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 246 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.755 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0 $$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.290 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2 $$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.756 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_property depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2 $$43.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579 $$1.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.62 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.265 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Merged via the queue into main with commit bd0d435 Nov 12, 2024
161 of 162 checks passed
@hash-worker hash-worker bot deleted the deps/gha/github-codeql-action-3.x branch November 12, 2024 21:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area)
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants