Update effect npm packages #5815

hash-worker · 2024-12-06T00:28:24Z

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
@effect/platform (source)	devDependencies	patch	`0.70.3` -> `0.70.4`
@effect/platform-node (source)	devDependencies	patch	`0.65.3` -> `0.65.4`
effect (source)	dependencies	patch	`3.11.2` -> `3.11.3`

Release Notes

Effect-TS/effect (@effect/platform)

`v0.70.4`

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Updated dependencies [90906f7, 3862cd3, 3862cd3, 343b6aa, afba339]:
- effect@3.11.3

Effect-TS/effect (@effect/platform-node)

`v0.65.4`

Compare Source

Patch Changes

Updated dependencies [90906f7, 3862cd3, 3862cd3, 343b6aa, afba339]:
- effect@3.11.3
- @effect/platform @0.70.4
- @effect/platform-node-shared @0.20.4

Effect-TS/effect (effect)

`v3.11.3`

Compare Source

Patch Changes

#4080 90906f7 Thanks @gcanti! - Fix the Schema.TemplateLiteral output type when the arguments include a branded type.

Before

import { Schema } from "effect"

const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteral(
  "a ",
  Schema.String.pipe(Schema.brand("MyBrand"))
)

// type Type = `a ${Schema.brand<typeof Schema.String, "MyBrand"> & string}`
// | `a ${Schema.brand<typeof Schema.String, "MyBrand"> & number}`
// | `a ${Schema.brand<typeof Schema.String, "MyBrand"> & bigint}`
// | `a ${Schema.brand<...> & false}`
// | `a ${Schema.brand<...> & true}`
type Type = typeof schema.Type

After

import { Schema } from "effect"

const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteral(
  "a ",
  Schema.String.pipe(Schema.brand("MyBrand"))
)

// type Type = `a ${string & Brand<"MyBrand">}`
type Type = typeof schema.Type

#4076 3862cd3 Thanks @gcanti! - Schema: fix bug in Schema.TemplateLiteralParser resulting in a runtime error.

Before

import { Schema } from "effect"

const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteralParser("a", "b")
// throws TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'replace')

After

import { Schema } from "effect"

const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteralParser("a", "b")

console.log(Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)("ab"))
// Output: [ 'a', 'b' ]

#4076 3862cd3 Thanks @gcanti! - SchemaAST: fix TemplateLiteral model.

Added Literal and Union as valid types.

#4083 343b6aa Thanks @gcanti! - Preserve MissingMessageAnnotations on property signature declarations when another field is a property signature transformation.

Before

import { Console, Effect, ParseResult, Schema } from "effect"

const schema = Schema.Struct({
  a: Schema.propertySignature(Schema.String).annotations({
    missingMessage: () => "message1"
  }),
  b: Schema.propertySignature(Schema.String)
    .annotations({ missingMessage: () => "message2" })
    .pipe(Schema.fromKey("c")), // <= transformation
  d: Schema.propertySignature(Schema.String).annotations({
    missingMessage: () => "message3"
  })
})

Effect.runPromiseExit(
  Schema.decodeUnknown(schema, { errors: "all" })({}).pipe(
    Effect.tapError((error) =>
      Console.log(ParseResult.ArrayFormatter.formatErrorSync(error))
    )
  )
)
/*
Output:
[
  { _tag: 'Missing', path: [ 'a' ], message: 'is missing' }, // <= wrong
  { _tag: 'Missing', path: [ 'c' ], message: 'message2' },
  { _tag: 'Missing', path: [ 'd' ], message: 'is missing' } // <= wrong
]
*/

After

import { Console, Effect, ParseResult, Schema } from "effect"

const schema = Schema.Struct({
  a: Schema.propertySignature(Schema.String).annotations({
    missingMessage: () => "message1"
  }),
  b: Schema.propertySignature(Schema.String)
    .annotations({ missingMessage: () => "message2" })
    .pipe(Schema.fromKey("c")), // <= transformation
  d: Schema.propertySignature(Schema.String).annotations({
    missingMessage: () => "message3"
  })
})

Effect.runPromiseExit(
  Schema.decodeUnknown(schema, { errors: "all" })({}).pipe(
    Effect.tapError((error) =>
      Console.log(ParseResult.ArrayFormatter.formatErrorSync(error))
    )
  )
)
/*
Output:
[
  { _tag: 'Missing', path: [ 'a' ], message: 'message1' },
  { _tag: 'Missing', path: [ 'c' ], message: 'message2' },
  { _tag: 'Missing', path: [ 'd' ], message: 'message3' }
]
*/

#4081 afba339 Thanks @gcanti! - Fix the behavior of Schema.TemplateLiteralParser when the arguments include literals other than string literals.

Before

import { Schema } from "effect"

const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteralParser(Schema.String, 1)

console.log(Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)("a1"))
/*
throws
ParseError: (`${string}1` <-> readonly [string, 1])
└─ Type side transformation failure
   └─ readonly [string, 1]
      └─ [1]
         └─ Expected 1, actual "1"
*/

After

import { Schema } from "effect"

const schema = Schema.TemplateLiteralParser(Schema.String, 1)

console.log(Schema.decodeUnknownSync(schema)("a1"))
// Output: [ 'a', 1 ]

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

github-actions · 2024-12-06T01:07:40Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$17.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 197 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.687 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.530 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.697 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 199 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-20.953 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 115 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.271 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$57.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.511 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$49.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 264 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 404 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$43.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 209 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.377 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 347 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$83.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 522 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.943 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$93.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.962 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 386 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.360 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579`	$$1.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.66 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.809 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.22 \mathrm{s} \pm 831 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.076 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.869 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.295 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$56.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 288 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$176 \mathrm{ms} \pm 505 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.91 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.390 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.22 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.55 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.572 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$14.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 49.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.770 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.01 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.469 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.804 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.74 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

Update effect npm packages

8388085

hash-worker bot enabled auto-merge December 6, 2024 00:28

github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Dec 6, 2024

hashdotai approved these changes Dec 6, 2024

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdev December 6, 2024 00:37 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash December 6, 2024 00:41 View deployment

hash-worker bot added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 6, 2024

Merged via the queue into main with commit 4c6bbee Dec 6, 2024
166 of 167 checks passed

hash-worker bot deleted the deps/js/effect-npm-packages branch December 6, 2024 01:21

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update effect npm packages #5815

Update effect npm packages #5815

hash-worker bot commented Dec 6, 2024

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2024

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

representative_read_multiple_entities

representative_read_entity_type

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

scaling_read_entity_linkless

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Update effect npm packages #5815

Update effect npm packages #5815

Conversation

hash-worker bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Release Notes

v0.70.4

Patch Changes

v0.65.4

Patch Changes

v3.11.3

Patch Changes

Configuration

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

representative_read_multiple_entities

representative_read_entity_type

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

scaling_read_entity_linkless

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

`v0.70.4`

`v0.65.4`

`v3.11.3`