Update GitHub Action github/codeql-action to v3.27.7

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
github/codeql-action	action	patch	v3.27.6 -> v3.27.7

---

Release Notes

github/codeql-action (github/codeql-action)

v3.27.7

Compare Source

CodeQL Action Changelog

See the releases page for the relevant changes to the CodeQL CLI and language packs.

Note that the only difference between v2 and v3 of the CodeQL Action is the node version they support, with v3 running on node 20 while we continue to release v2 to support running on node 16. For example 3.22.11 was the first v3 release and is functionally identical to 2.22.11. This approach ensures an easy way to track exactly which features are included in different versions, indicated by the minor and patch version numbers.

3.27.7 - 10 Dec 2024

• We are rolling out a change in December 2024 that will extract the CodeQL bundle directly to the toolcache to improve performance. #​2631
• Update default CodeQL bundle version to 2.20.0. #​2636

See the full CHANGELOG.md for more information.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 2am on saturday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.97%. Comparing base (3790335) to head (fef0fc7).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5852      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.99%   22.97%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         569      571       +2     
  Lines       19096    19300     +204     
  Branches     2709     2728      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         4392     4435      +43     
- Misses      14652    14812     +160     
- Partials       52       53       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	62.15% <ø> (-5.99%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.99% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 178 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-26.573 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.804 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.449 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 204 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.392 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.977 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$63.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.907 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$36.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 375 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.407 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.437 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$41.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.008 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$46.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.389 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$40.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$95.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 353 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.054 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$79.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 484 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.833 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$87.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.976 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$92.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 470 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.071 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.92 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$271 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.17 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 275 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 118 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$56.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.150 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$175 \mathrm{ms} \pm 971 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.395 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.26 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.02 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.28 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.526 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 64.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.317 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.761 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.77 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.072 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.025 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.68 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.466 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.334 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph