H-3710: Support DNS for HaRPC client and align environment variables

[TimDiekmann]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

To allow HaRPC in AWS we need to allow DNS lookups in the client. This is needed to connect the different services as the IP of the graph could change with a redeployment and the DNS is stable. The situation is used to align the environment variables for the RPC and HTTP endpoints for the graph.

🔍 What does this change?

• Use dns for the address for the HaRPC client
• Enable HaRPC in dev-mode locally
• Set an appropriated logging level
• Align environment variables for the Graph
• Prepare HaRPC on AWS (but keep it disabled)

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

❓ How to test this?

I did a lot of manual testing but I need the graph to be deployed in production to test this. As we use x86 in AWS I currently don't have a way to build those images locally and upload them without changing the AWS config.
There is a small chance that some environment variable was missed, but without a staging environment we cannot avoid this risk.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 22.97%. Comparing base (3790335) to head (314db98).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
apps/hash-api/src/generate-ontology-type-ids.ts	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5856      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   22.99%   22.97%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         569      571       +2     
  Lines       19096    19298     +202     
  Branches     2709     2728      +19     
==========================================
+ Hits         4392     4433      +41     
- Misses      14652    14812     +160     
- Partials       52       53       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <0.00%> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	62.15% <ø> (-5.99%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.80% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.99% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	87.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 170 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.42 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 247 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}12.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.498 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$18.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 234 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 388 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$42.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 313 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.981 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 187 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.016 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 316 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 600 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.474 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$44.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 203 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$97.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 689 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.279 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$84.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$89.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 425 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.103 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$93.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 355 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.55 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.644 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$273 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.87 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 304 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.712 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}54.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$175 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.08 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.898 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.76 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.12 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.65 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.962 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$9.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.068 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-20.083 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 8.26 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.715 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.57 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

[indietyp]

Thank you! 🎉 Minor remaining non-blocking questions