H-3691: Replace lockfile-lint with yarn constraints

[indietyp]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

lockfile-lint is quite simple in it's use-case (for us it's simply checking the source and parsing the file). Instead of needing to use a new tool to do so we can make use of yarn constraints to ensure that we don't use any of the sources we currently do not allow.

This also allows us to make changes that are a lot more stringent than lockfile-lint allowed previously. See the change to see what we're enforcing and how.

we also support the patch: protocol, unlike lockfile-lint

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 22.87%. Comparing base (5e43293) to head (035bd36).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5858   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   22.87%   22.87%           
=======================================
  Files         572      573    +1     
  Lines       19415    19428   +13     
  Branches     2752     2754    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         4442     4445    +3     
- Misses      14920    14930   +10     
  Partials       53       53           

Flag	Coverage Δ
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.51% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.224 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.998 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.524 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 202 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.032 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.872 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.785 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$67.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 418 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.985 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$58.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 153 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.692 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 221 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$50.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$54.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 365 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.953 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 571 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.539 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 152 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 358 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.944 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$85.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 399 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.37 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$92.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 511 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.316 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$98.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 734 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.031 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.18 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$268 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.43 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$26.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 141 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.634 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$51.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.49 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}6.66 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$175 \mathrm{ms} \pm 773 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.08 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.258 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.62 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.662 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.537 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 46.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.279 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.302 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$1.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.593 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.750 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.81 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.883 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.17 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.399 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph