H-3778: Resolve DNS entries on connection re-use

[indietyp]

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

When connecting via libp2p over DNS the addresses that are saved on the peer are the ipv4 ones, not the dns entry, this lead to harpc forcing and maintaining a new connection.

This is (of course) not ideal, as DNS isn't "built-in" (it simply exploits the fact that node:net can resolve dns entries) we need to resolve the DNS entries ourselves and match them with the ones libp2p uses.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

• does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

• are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

• do not affect the execution graph

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 14.41441% with 95 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 22.90%. Comparing base (cb79928) to head (dce8277).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...pc/client/typescript/src/net/internal/transport.ts	13.09%	73 Missing ⚠️
...pc/client/typescript/src/net/internal/multiaddr.ts	18.51%	22 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5859      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   23.01%   22.90%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         569      572       +3     
  Lines       19087    19389     +302     
  Branches     2709     2745      +36     
==========================================
+ Hits         4392     4442      +50     
- Misses      14643    14894     +251     
- Partials       52       53       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.16% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	58.98% <14.41%> (-9.16%)	⬇️
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	1.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$18.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 228 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-27.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$18.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 237 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.095 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$19.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 229 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$18.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$17.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$18.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 245 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.162 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$17.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 243 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$68.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 273 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.499 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$41.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$59.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 223 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.422 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$45.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 140 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.896 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$51.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 168 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.268 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$55.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 164 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.962 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$114 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.686 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$45.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 222 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.488 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 517 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$86.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 412 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.691 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$96.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.178 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 269 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.001 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$1.42 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.96 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.081 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$280 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.54 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$54.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.56 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.331 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$181 \mathrm{ms} \pm 816 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.71 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.83 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.47 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.78 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}48.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-16.454 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.73 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph